James B. Ifft

789 citations
22 papers · 657 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

James B. Ifft

22 papers receiving 594 citations

Peers

James B. Ifft
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Filtration and Separation 29
  • Molecular Biology 387
  • Spectroscopy 82
  • Ecology 98
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 22
Replace Josef Floßdorf with:
Josef Floßdorf Germany
Robert Bruner United States
Joseph Eigner United States
A. Nicolaïeff France
C. Frontali Italy
Mauricio Carrillo‐Tripp Mexico
M. T. Silva Portugal
Richard C. Deonier United States
Raymond P. Mariella United States
George W. Rushizky United States
James B. Ifft relative to Josef Floßdorf Germany Josef Floßdorf's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Josef Floßdorf · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James B. Ifft

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James B. Ifft's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James B. Ifft with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James B. Ifft more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James B. Ifft

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James B. Ifft. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James B. Ifft. The network helps show where James B. Ifft may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside James B. Ifft, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James B. Ifft Line = papers co-authored together James B. Ifft links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1961362
2 196649
3 196145
4 197034
5 196230
6 198222
7 196714
8 196913
9 197312
10 197312
11 197612
12 197810
13 19767
14 19757
15 19776
16 19786
17 19776
18 19754
19 19782
20 19792

About James B. Ifft

James B. Ifft is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Spectroscopy and Filtration and Separation, having authored 22 papers that have together received 657 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Protein purification and stability (6 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (5 papers), Chemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions (4 papers), Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis (4 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (4 papers), Field-Flow Fractionation Techniques (3 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (3 papers) and Thermodynamic properties of mixtures (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Filtration and Separation (29 citations), Molecular Biology (387 citations), Spectroscopy (82 citations), Ecology (98 citations) and Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (22 citations). James B. Ifft has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Jerome Vinograd, John E. Hearst, William R. Martin, J. Leland Hollenberg, Dan S. Sharp, Lawrence G. Lum, David A. Ellis and Martin Ottesen. Their work appears in journals such as Biopolymers, The Journal of Physical Chemistry, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects, Biophysical Chemistry and Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact