Jamal El‐Den

27 papers receiving 348 citations

Peers

Jamal El‐Den
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Communication 65
  • Computer Science Applications 29
  • Information Systems and Management 35
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 10
  • Business and International Management 7
Replace Bill Davey with:
Bill Davey Australia
Chang Boon Patrick Lee Macao
José Braga de Vasconcelos Portugal
Sameer Verma United States
Mehdi Khosrowpour United States
Jami Carroll Australia
Muhammad Arif Pakistan
Cristina Casado‐Lumbreras Spain
Sven A. Carlsson Sweden
Ileana Hamburg Germany
Jamal El‐Den relative to Bill Davey Australia Bill Davey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Bill Davey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jamal El‐Den

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jamal El‐Den's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jamal El‐Den with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jamal El‐Den more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jamal El‐Den

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jamal El‐Den. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jamal El‐Den. The network helps show where Jamal El‐Den may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Jamal El‐Den, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jamal El‐Den Line = papers co-authored together Jamal El‐Den links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201751
2 202146
3 202341
4 201533
5 201623
6 201920
7 202319
8 201715
9 201915
10 201514
11 201413
12 202013
13 200813
14 202013
15 202110
16 20198
17
Applying Positive Psychology to Knowledge Management
20125
18
A Conceptual Model for Knowledge Sharing Among Small Groups Using Discussion Cases
20163
19 20182
20 20172

About Jamal El‐Den

Jamal El‐Den is a scholar working on Education, Communication, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Social Psychology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 368 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Knowledge Management and Sharing (8 papers), Online and Blended Learning (7 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (6 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (4 papers), Information and Cyber Security (3 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (3 papers), Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior (2 papers) and Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (65 citations), Computer Science Applications (29 citations), Information Systems and Management (35 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (10 citations) and Business and International Management (7 citations). Jamal El‐Den has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Vietnam and China. Frequent co-authors include Narumon Sriratanaviriyakul, Sami Azam, Fatemeh Torabi, Joan Richardson, Asif Karim, Muhammad Imran Sharif, Hiep Pham, Rui Zhang, Tri Lam and Mathews Nkhoma. Their work appears in journals such as Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, Journal of Knowledge Management, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences and Active Learning in Higher Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact