Jamal El‐Den

27 papers receiving 382 citations

Peers

Jamal El‐Den
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Communication 68
  • Computer Science Applications 33
  • Information Systems and Management 37
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 10
  • Strategy and Management 53
Replace Sameer Verma with:
Sameer Verma United States
Muhammad Arif Pakistan
Jami Carroll Australia
Briony J. Oates United Kingdom
Patricia M Alexander South Africa
Chennupati Kodanda Ramaiah India
John R. Drake United States
Cristina Casado Lumbreras Spain
Grandon Gill United States
Kai‐Uwe Loser Germany
Jamal El‐Den relative to Sameer Verma United States Sameer Verma's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×13×
Sameer Verma · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jamal El‐Den

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jamal El‐Den's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jamal El‐Den with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jamal El‐Den more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jamal El‐Den

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jamal El‐Den. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jamal El‐Den. The network helps show where Jamal El‐Den may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Jamal El‐Den, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jamal El‐Den Line = papers co-authored together Jamal El‐Den links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201760
2 202154
3 202344
4 201535
5 201925
6 201623
7 202321
8 202017
9 201717
10 201915
11 202014
12 201414
13 201514
14 200812
15 202111
16 20199
17
Applying Positive Psychology to Knowledge Management
20125
18 20252
19 20172
20 20202

About Jamal El‐Den

Jamal El‐Den is a scholar working on Communication, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Management Information Systems, Education and Information Systems and Management, having authored 28 papers that have together received 404 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Knowledge Management and Sharing (9 papers), Online and Blended Learning (7 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (6 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (5 papers), Information and Cyber Security (3 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (3 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (2 papers) and Quality and Supply Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (68 citations), Computer Science Applications (33 citations), Information Systems and Management (37 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (10 citations) and Strategy and Management (53 citations). Jamal El‐Den has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, China and Vietnam. Frequent co-authors include Narumon Sriratanaviriyakul, Sami Azam, Fatemeh Torabi, Joan Richardson, Asif Karim, Muhammad Imran Sharif, Hiep Cong Pham, Tri Khai Lam, Mathews Zanda Nkhoma and Rui Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Active Learning in Higher Education and Journal of Knowledge Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact