Jacquelyn Cranney

78 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Jacquelyn Cranney
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 440
  • General Psychology 112
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.1k
  • Biological Psychiatry 118
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 800
Replace David C. Riccio with:
David C. Riccio United States
Daphne J. Holt United States
L Cahill United States
Tom Beckers Belgium
J.L. McGaugh United States
Peter Annas Sweden
Werner Wippich Germany
Roelof Eikelboom Canada
F. Robert Brush United States
Hasker P. Davis United States
Jacquelyn Cranney relative to David C. Riccio United States David C. Riccio's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.2×
David C. Riccio · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jacquelyn Cranney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jacquelyn Cranney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jacquelyn Cranney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jacquelyn Cranney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jacquelyn Cranney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jacquelyn Cranney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jacquelyn Cranney. The network helps show where Jacquelyn Cranney may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jacquelyn Cranney, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jacquelyn Cranney Line = papers co-authored together Jacquelyn Cranney links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 82 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003354
2 2005206
3 2010183
4 2004177
5 2004166
6 198983
7 201082
8 199076
9 200861
10 200952
11 199544
12 198843
13 201143
14 200836
15 201329
16 200926
17 198023
18 200921
19 200120
20 201120

About Jacquelyn Cranney

Jacquelyn Cranney is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, General Psychology and Education, having authored 82 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (19 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (11 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (11 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (9 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (9 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (8 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (7 papers) and Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (440 citations), General Psychology (112 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.1k citations), Biological Psychiatry (118 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (800 citations). Jacquelyn Cranney has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Rick Richardson, Robert N. Leaton, Steve R. Makkar, Dana S. Dunn, Sue E. Morris, George S. Borszcz, Kaaren Watts, Roderick Ashton, Shirley Zhang and Ben R. Newell. Their work appears in journals such as Behavioral Neuroscience, Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, Body Image, American Psychologist and Neuropsychologia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact