F. Robert Brush

53 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

F. Robert Brush
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 531
  • Social Psychology 449
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 393
  • General Psychology 26
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 340
Replace Giorgio Bignami with:
Giorgio Bignami Italy
Gary D. Coover United States
Judson S. Brown United States
Merle E. Meyer United States
Peter L. Carlton United States
Robert A. Rosellini United States
William F. Caul United States
Harry I. Kalish United States
Paul J. Woods United States
James R. Misanin United States
F. Robert Brush relative to Giorgio Bignami Italy Giorgio Bignami's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Giorgio Bignami · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Robert Brush

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Robert Brush's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Robert Brush with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Robert Brush more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Robert Brush

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Robert Brush. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Robert Brush. The network helps show where F. Robert Brush may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. Robert Brush, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Robert Brush Line = papers co-authored together F. Robert Brush links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Affect, conditioning, and cognition : essays on the determinants of behavior
1985157
2 197289
3 197582
4 195782
5 198575
6 196271
7 196668
8 197967
9 197464
10 199164
11 196347
12 198839
13 200337
14 197937
15 197635
16 197532
17 196632
18 195532
19 196432
20 195629

About F. Robert Brush

F. Robert Brush is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 53 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stress Responses and Cortisol (22 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (11 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (9 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (8 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (7 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (7 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (6 papers) and Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (531 citations), Social Psychology (449 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (393 citations), General Psychology (26 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (340 citations). F. Robert Brush has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Poland and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Richard L. Solomon, J. Bruce Overmier, M. T. Jones, R Neame, David F. Berger, Peter C. Sakellaris, Seymour Levine, Janice C. Froehlich, Louis Pellegrino and James S. Myer. Their work appears in journals such as Behavior Genetics, Journal of comparative psychology, Physiology & Behavior, Journal of Endocrinology and Behavioral Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact