Jacob Busch
Impact in
- Health Informatics top 1%
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Family Practice top 10%
Papers in
-
- Philosophy and History of Science 15
-
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 7
- Co-authors
- Jens Christian Bjerring (3 shared papers)Dennis van Liempd (1 shared paper)Anders Haug (4 shared papers)Antoinette Fage‐Butler (3 shared papers)Loni Ledderer (3 shared papers)Carsten Bergenholtz (4 shared papers)Joe Morrison (1 shared paper)Scott A. Shalkowski (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Synthese (2 papers)International Studies in the Philosophy of Science (2 papers)Theoria (2 papers)Croatian Journal of Philosophy (1 paper)AI & Society (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- DenmarkUnited KingdomSlovenia
In The Last Decade
Jacob Busch
28 papers receiving 463 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Health Informatics 115
- Family Practice 21
- History and Philosophy of Science 59
- Marketing 77
- Applied Psychology 22
Countries citing papers authored by Jacob Busch
This map shows the geographic impact of Jacob Busch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jacob Busch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jacob Busch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jacob Busch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jacob Busch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jacob Busch. The network helps show where Jacob Busch may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Jacob Busch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 172 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 108 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 79 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 32 | |
| 5 | 2003 | 21 | |
| 6 | Does the issue of response-dependence have any consequences for realism? | 2006 | 11 |
| 7 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2019 | 2 |
About Jacob Busch
Jacob Busch is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Global and Planetary Change, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Safety Research, having authored 30 papers that have together received 493 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (15 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (7 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (6 papers), Science and Climate Studies (6 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (2 papers) and Environmental Sustainability in Business (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (115 citations), Family Practice (21 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (59 citations), Marketing (77 citations) and Applied Psychology (22 citations). Jacob Busch has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, United Kingdom and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include Jens Christian Bjerring, Dennis van Liempd, Anders Haug, Antoinette Fage‐Butler, Loni Ledderer, Carsten Bergenholtz, Joe Morrison, Scott A. Shalkowski, Otávio Bueno and David Shaw. Their work appears in journals such as Synthese, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Theoria, Croatian Journal of Philosophy and AI & Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.