Jack Zipes

1.8k citations
47 papers · 881 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Jack Zipes

32 papers receiving 437 citations

Peers

Jack Zipes
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Literature and Literary Theory 373
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 81
  • Gender Studies 139
  • Philosophy 125
  • Cultural Studies 81
Replace Naomi Schor with:
Naomi Schor United States
Jane Gallop United States
Paula Marantz Cohen United States
Hans H. Rudnick United States
Vincent B. Leitch
Susan Rubín Suleiman United States
Keith Cohen
Catherine Belsey United Kingdom
Elisabeth Bronfen Switzerland
Jacques-Alain Miller France
Jack Zipes relative to Naomi Schor United States Naomi Schor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×
Naomi Schor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jack Zipes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jack Zipes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack Zipes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack Zipes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jack Zipes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack Zipes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack Zipes. The network helps show where Jack Zipes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Jack Zipes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jack Zipes Line = papers co-authored together Jack Zipes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The Utopian Function of Art and Literature: Selected Essays
1988225
2 1977112
3 1988108
4 1975107
5 200890
6 199970
7 198839
8 198920
9 198314
10 199714
11 198113
12 197411
13 19757
14 20195
15 19915
16 20134
17 19774
18 20163
19 20093
20 19923

About Jack Zipes

Jack Zipes is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Philosophy and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 47 papers that have together received 881 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (19 papers), Themes in Literature Analysis (11 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (4 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (2 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (2 papers), Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (2 papers), German Literature and Culture Studies (2 papers) and Critical Theory and Philosophy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (373 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (81 citations), Gender Studies (139 citations), Philosophy (125 citations) and Cultural Studies (81 citations). Jack Zipes has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kimberley Reynolds, Barbara Correll, Siegfried Kracauer, Karín Lesnik‐Oberstein, Steven Swann Jones, Wolfgang Mieder, Christopher Innes, Ernst Bloch, Marina Warner and Oskar Negt. Their work appears in journals such as Common Knowledge, Modern Language Journal, Journal of American Folklore, The Modern Language Review and Folklore.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact