Christopher Innes

819 citations
58 papers · 283 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Christopher Innes

38 papers receiving 138 citations

Peers

Christopher Innes
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 112
  • Music 52
  • Literature and Literary Theory 109
  • History 25
  • Philosophy 24
Replace Donald Spoto with:
Donald Spoto
Steven Price United Kingdom
Alan Munton United Kingdom
Felicia McCarren United States
Elinor Fuchs United States
J. L. Styan United States
Ann Daly United States
Alice Rayner United Kingdom
Stuart A. Selby Canada
Andrew Hewitt United Kingdom
Christopher Innes relative to Donald Spoto Donald Spoto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×13×
Donald Spoto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Innes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Innes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Innes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Innes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Innes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Innes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Innes. The network helps show where Christopher Innes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Innes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher Innes Line = papers co-authored together Christopher Innes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199933
2 201133
3 200319
4 198218
5
Politics and the playwright : George Ryga
198516
6
Modern British Drama, 1890–1990
199215
7 197411
8 201310
9 200210
10 197310
11 201310
12 20059
13 19879
14 19738
15 20076
16
Designing Modern America: Broadway to Main Street
20056
17 20065
18 20055
19 19984
20
Directors/Directing: Conversations on Theatre
20094

About Christopher Innes

Christopher Innes is a scholar working on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Philosophy and Music, having authored 58 papers that have together received 283 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theatre and Performance Studies (25 papers), Irish and British Studies (11 papers), Cultural Studies and Interdisciplinary Research (8 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (8 papers), Theater, Performance, and Music History (6 papers), Literature Analysis and Criticism (6 papers), Art, Politics, and Modernism (4 papers) and German Literature and Culture Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (112 citations), Music (52 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (109 citations), History (25 citations) and Philosophy (24 citations). Christopher Innes has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Elinor Fuchs, Jack Zipes, David Trotter, Glen MacLeod, James Longenbach, Sara Blair, Marianne DeKoven, Michael Wood, Michael Bell and Michael Levenson. Their work appears in journals such as Modern Drama, The Modern Language Review, Theatre Research in Canada, Scandinavian Studies and The German Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact