Christopher Innes

819 citations
47 papers · 180 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Christopher Innes

27 papers receiving 90 citations

Peers

Christopher Innes
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 84
  • Music 34
  • Literature and Literary Theory 61
  • General Arts and Humanities 2
  • History 16
Replace Donald Spoto with:
Donald Spoto
Steven Price United Kingdom
Joseph Viscomi United States
Mary Luckhurst United Kingdom
J. L. Styan United States
Eric Bentley
John M. Clum
Alice Rayner United Kingdom
Bernard F. Dukore United States
Alan Munton United Kingdom
Christopher Innes relative to Donald Spoto Donald Spoto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Donald Spoto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Innes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Innes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Innes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Innes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Innes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Innes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Innes. The network helps show where Christopher Innes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Innes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher Innes Line = papers co-authored together Christopher Innes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199917
2 200317
3
Modern British Drama, 1890–1990
199215
4 198215
5 201111
6 197410
7 20139
8 20029
9 20138
10 19878
11 20057
12 19736
13 20065
14 20075
15 20053
16 19833
17
Designing Modern America: Broadway to Main Street
20053
18
Directors/Directing: Conversations on Theatre
20093
19
Estimation and tracking of excavated material in mining
20113
20 19892

About Christopher Innes

Christopher Innes is a scholar working on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Music and Philosophy, having authored 47 papers that have together received 180 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theatre and Performance Studies (21 papers), Irish and British Studies (9 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (8 papers), Cultural Studies and Interdisciplinary Research (6 papers), Theater, Performance, and Music History (6 papers), Art, Politics, and Modernism (4 papers), Literature Analysis and Criticism (4 papers) and German Literature and Culture Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (84 citations), Music (34 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (61 citations), General Arts and Humanities (2 citations) and History (16 citations). Christopher Innes has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Elinor Fuchs, Jack Zipes, John Stokes, Michael Wood, Sara Blair, Marianne DeKoven, James Longenbach, David Trotter, Michael Levenson and Glen MacLeod. Their work appears in journals such as Modern Drama, The Modern Language Review, Theatre Research in Canada, English studies in Canada and Theatre Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact