Jane Gallop
Impact in
-
- Contemporary Literature and Criticism
- Themes in Literature Analysis
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Gender, Feminism, and Media
- Gender Roles and Identity Studies
- Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies
Papers in
-
- Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics 5
- Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research 2
-
- French Literature and Criticism 4
- American and British Literature Analysis 1
- Co-authors
- Elizabeth Wright (1 shared paper)Marja Warehime (1 shared paper)Linda Wagner‐Martin (1 shared paper)Catherine Clément (1 shared paper)Carol Sanger (1 shared paper)Peter Collier (1 shared paper)Bonner Mitchell (1 shared paper)Tania Modleski (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- diacritics (5 papers)SubStance (4 papers)Critical Inquiry (3 papers)differences (2 papers)Representations (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNorway
In The Last Decade
Jane Gallop
50 papers receiving 436 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Literature and Literary Theory 243
- Gender Studies 176
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 68
- Philosophy 121
- Cultural Studies 88
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Gallop
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Gallop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Gallop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Gallop more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Gallop
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Gallop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Gallop. The network helps show where Jane Gallop may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Gallop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1988 | 152 | |
| 2 | 1985 | 134 | |
| 3 | 1997 | 75 | |
| 4 | Polemic: Critical or Uncritical | 2004 | 67 |
| 5 | 2007 | 45 | |
| 6 | 2002 | 43 | |
| 7 | 1997 | 23 | |
| 8 | 1984 | 20 | |
| 9 | 1982 | 16 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 15 | |
| 12 | 1982 | 14 | |
| 13 | 1983 | 13 | |
| 14 | 1987 | 12 | |
| 15 | 1986 | 12 | |
| 16 | 1987 | 12 | |
| 17 | 1983 | 12 | |
| 18 | 1994 | 11 | |
| 19 | 1997 | 10 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 9 |
About Jane Gallop
Jane Gallop is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory, Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 65 papers that have together received 833 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics (5 papers), French Literature and Criticism (4 papers), Rousseau and Enlightenment Thought (4 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (4 papers), Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research (2 papers), Marxism and Critical Theory (1 paper), American and British Literature Analysis (1 paper) and Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (243 citations), Gender Studies (176 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (68 citations), Philosophy (121 citations) and Cultural Studies (88 citations). Jane Gallop has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth Wright, Marja Warehime, Linda Wagner‐Martin, Catherine Clément, Carol Sanger, Peter Collier, Bonner Mitchell, Tania Modleski, Carla Kaplan and Ann Cvetkovich. Their work appears in journals such as diacritics, SubStance, Critical Inquiry, differences and Representations.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.