Jack Woods

638 citations
35 papers · 291 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Jack Woods

32 papers receiving 225 citations

Peers

Jack Woods
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Philosophy 203
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 141
  • History and Philosophy of Science 45
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 84
  • Theoretical Computer Science 4
Replace J. L. Dowell with:
J. L. Dowell United States
Stephen Kearns United States
Bob Beddor Singapore
Carrie S. Jenkins United Kingdom
Nate Charlow Canada
Patrick Greenough United Kingdom
Marian A. David United States
Ofra Magidor United Kingdom
Dan López de Spain
Juhani Yli‐Vakkuri Norway
Jack Woods relative to J. L. Dowell United States J. L. Dowell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×
J. L. Dowell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jack Woods

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jack Woods's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack Woods with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack Woods more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jack Woods

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack Woods. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack Woods. The network helps show where Jack Woods may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Jack Woods, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jack Woods Line = papers co-authored together Jack Woods links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202042
2 201534
3
EXPRESSIVISM AND MOORE'S PARADOX
201428
4 201727
5 201824
6 201624
7 201816
8 201715
9 201610
10 20188
11 20188
12 20187
13 20176
14 20106
15 20183
16
Spatial and Temporal Stability of Hierarchically Segmented Regions for use as Conjugate Pairs in the Estimation of Depth and Tracking.
20033
17 20173
18 20193
19 20212
20 20232

About Jack Woods

Jack Woods is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 35 papers that have together received 291 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (13 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (10 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (8 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (6 papers), Free Will and Agency (5 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (3 papers) and Philosophy and History of Science (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (203 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (141 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (45 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (84 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (4 citations). Jack Woods has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Barry Maguire, Derek Baker, Richard D. Richmond, Ernest E. Armstrong, Joe Charles Campbell, Abbas Haddadi, Daniel Karlsson, K. K. Choi, Seth R. Bank and Achyut K. Dutta. Their work appears in journals such as Thought A Journal of Philosophy, Philosophical Studies, The Philosophical Review, Noûs and Philosophia Mathematica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact