Thought A Journal of Philosophy

320 papers and 1.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 320 papers published in Thought A Journal of Philosophy in the last decades have received a total of 1.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Thought A Journal of Philosophy usually cover Philosophy (198 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (181 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (81 papers) specifically the topics of Philosophy and Theoretical Science (178 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (148 papers) and Philosophy and History of Science (70 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Thought A Journal of Philosophy are Ned Block, Michael Blome‐Tillmann, Endre Begby, Susanna Rinard, Tuomas E. Tahko, Katherine Ritchie, Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa, Sven Rosenkranz, Richard G. Heck and Angela Mendelovici.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Thought A Journal of Philosophy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Thought A Journal of Philosophy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Thought A Journal of Philosophy.

Countries where authors publish in Thought A Journal of Philosophy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Thought A Journal of Philosophy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Thought A Journal of Philosophy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thought A Journal of Philosophy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025