Jack E. Sherman

54 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers

Jack E. Sherman
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 758
  • Biological Psychiatry 160
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 940
  • Applied Psychology 199
  • Sensory Systems 135
Replace Robert C. Drugan with:
Robert C. Drugan United States
Larissa A. Pohorecky United States
Lawrence S. Sklar Canada
Mary C. Olmstead Canada
John Kasckow United States
Stuart Checkley United Kingdom
Tommy Pattij Netherlands
Mary‐Anne Enoch United States
Wendy J. Lynch United States
Adam C. Mar United Kingdom
Jack E. Sherman relative to Robert C. Drugan United States Robert C. Drugan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Robert C. Drugan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jack E. Sherman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jack E. Sherman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack E. Sherman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack E. Sherman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jack E. Sherman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack E. Sherman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack E. Sherman. The network helps show where Jack E. Sherman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jack E. Sherman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jack E. Sherman Line = papers co-authored together Jack E. Sherman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The motivation to use drugs: a psychobiological analysis of urges.
1986386
2 2008270
3 1989167
4 1982167
5 1989158
6 1980111
7 1988110
8 1992109
9 1996102
10
The opioid/nonopioid nature of stress-induced analgesia and learned helplessness.
198398
11 198386
12 199086
13 197986
14 198074
15 198872
16 200672
17 200467
18 198355
19 198755
20 198947

About Jack E. Sherman

Jack E. Sherman is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Behavioral Neuroscience and Social Psychology, having authored 55 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (11 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (11 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (8 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (6 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (6 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (4 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (4 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (758 citations), Biological Psychiatry (160 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (940 citations), Applied Psychology (199 citations) and Sensory Systems (135 citations). Jack E. Sherman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Timothy B. Baker, Ned H. Kalin, Lorey K. Takahashi, John C. Liebeskind, James W. Lewis, Jennifer A. Vanden Burgt, Eric W. Holman, Michael G. Tordoff, Michael C. Zinser and Steven F. Maier. Their work appears in journals such as Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, Behavioral Neuroscience, Learning and Motivation, Rehabilitation Psychology and Life Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact