Jack C. Taylor

8 papers receiving 254 citations

Peers

Jack C. Taylor
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Cell Biology 90
  • Biological Psychiatry 9
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 64
  • Clinical Psychology 57
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 41
Replace Ken H. Tachiki with:
Ken H. Tachiki United States
Frederike Winkel Finland
Vesna Lazarevic Sweden
Angela Jacques Australia
Jenny I. Aguilar United States
Hiroichi Tasaki Japan
Silvia Gatti McArthur United Kingdom
Micah J. Eimerbrink United States
Nancy Bubula United States
Cécile Pagan France
Jack C. Taylor relative to Ken H. Tachiki United States Ken H. Tachiki's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×22×
Ken H. Tachiki · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jack C. Taylor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jack C. Taylor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack C. Taylor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack C. Taylor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jack C. Taylor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack C. Taylor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack C. Taylor. The network helps show where Jack C. Taylor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jack C. Taylor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jack C. Taylor Line = papers co-authored together Jack C. Taylor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2016111
2 202063
3 201928
4
Digital Cognitive Assessments for Dementia: Digital assessments may enhance the efficiency of evaluations in neurology and other clinics.
202028
5 202120
6 20215
7 20241
8 20231

About Jack C. Taylor

Jack C. Taylor is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cell Biology, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 8 papers that have together received 257 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (4 papers), Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications (3 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (2 papers), Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (1 paper), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (1 paper), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (1 paper), Delphi Technique in Research (1 paper) and Computational Drug Discovery Methods (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (90 citations), Biological Psychiatry (9 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (64 citations), Clinical Psychology (57 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (41 citations). Jack C. Taylor has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include David Kokel, Giancarlo N. Bruni, Douglas Myers-Turnbull, Michael J. Keiser, Matthew N. McCarroll, Leo Gendelev, Adam M. Staffaroni, Adam L. Boxer, Randall T. Peterson and Elena Tsoy. Their work appears in journals such as Alzheimer s & Dementia, Nature Communications, Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring, Nature Chemical Biology and Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact