J. Schmidt

451 citations
29 papers · 370 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

J. Schmidt

28 papers receiving 358 citations

Peers

J. Schmidt
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Biomedical Engineering 271
  • Molecular Biology 184
  • Physiology 10
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 55
  • Water Science and Technology 23
Replace O. Woywode with:
O. Woywode Germany
Christian Kaethner Germany
Mandy Ahlborg Germany
Azeem Sarwar United States
Valentin Mendelev Russia
Xinjia Li China
Müge Anıl-İnevi Türkiye
Xieliu Yang China
E. Tournier France
Jeffrey Harmon Japan
J. Schmidt relative to O. Woywode Germany O. Woywode's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
O. Woywode · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Schmidt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Schmidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Schmidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Schmidt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Schmidt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Schmidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Schmidt. The network helps show where J. Schmidt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. Schmidt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Schmidt Line = papers co-authored together J. Schmidt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201289
2 201352
3 201537
4 201335
5 201132
6 197522
7 201212
8 201311
9 200210
10 19768
11 20098
12 20227
13 20186
14 19816
15 19855
16 19995
17 19824
18 19894
19 20213
20 19922

About J. Schmidt

J. Schmidt is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Molecular Biology, Artificial Intelligence and Management Information Systems, having authored 29 papers that have together received 370 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles (10 papers), Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (7 papers), Business Process Modeling and Analysis (5 papers), Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (5 papers), Advanced Memory and Neural Computing (3 papers), Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography (3 papers), Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (3 papers) and Cognitive Computing and Networks (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomedical Engineering (271 citations), Molecular Biology (184 citations), Physiology (10 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (55 citations) and Water Science and Technology (23 citations). J. Schmidt has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Finland and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Jürgen Rahmer, Ingo Schmale, Bernhard Gleich, Claas Bontus, O. Woywode, Jörn Borgert, B. David, J. Borgert, Jürgen Weizenecker and Thomas Wendler. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Digital Imaging, RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren, Frontiers in Neuroscience, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography and Electronics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact