J. Krier

30 papers receiving 570 citations

Peers

J. Krier
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Gastroenterology 158
  • Equine 28
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 108
  • Urology 74
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 230
Replace A.M. Booth with:
A.M. Booth United States
Vickie L. Erickson United States
Susan L. Erdman United States
Heather L. Robbins Australia
W. Steers United States
Penny A. Lynn Australia
R. Curtis Rogers United States
J. P. Messenger Australia
S.J. Gibson United States
Q. Sang Australia
J. Krier relative to A.M. Booth United States A.M. Booth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
A.M. Booth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Krier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Krier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Krier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Krier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Krier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Krier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Krier. The network helps show where J. Krier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside J. Krier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Krier Line = papers co-authored together J. Krier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1978101
2 197957
3 197653
4 197935
5 198332
6 197530
7 198228
8 198528
9 198226
10 199326
11 199426
12 199123
13 198723
14 199018
15 198815
16 199413
17 199113
18 198412
19 198912
20 198711

About J. Krier

J. Krier is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology, Molecular Biology, Gastroenterology and Surgery, having authored 30 papers that have together received 634 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (12 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (10 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (10 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (5 papers), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (5 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (4 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (4 papers) and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (158 citations), Equine (28 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (108 citations), Urology (74 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (230 citations). J. Krier has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and South Sudan. Frequent co-authors include William C. de Groat, Joseph H. Szurszewski, Kalina Venkova, Toshihiko Nishimura, T. Akasu, Charles Kennedy, Karl B. Thor, Y Julé, Ronald A. Meyer and P. F. Schmalz. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, The Journal of Physiology, British Journal of Pharmacology, Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology and Gastroenterology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact