A.M. Booth

19 papers receiving 794 citations

Peers

A.M. Booth
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Urology 343
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 384
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 128
  • Physiology 267
  • Equine 15
Replace Masaru Kuru with:
Masaru Kuru Japan
W. Steers United States
J. Krier United States
Quan‐Ming Zhu United States
Thaddeus S. Brink United States
Melinda Kyloh Australia
Natalie R. Krenz Canada
S.J. Gibson United States
Judy L. Morris Australia
J. G. Collins United States
A.M. Booth relative to Masaru Kuru Japan Masaru Kuru's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Masaru Kuru · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by A.M. Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A.M. Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A.M. Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A.M. Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A.M. Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A.M. Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A.M. Booth. The network helps show where A.M. Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside A.M. Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with A.M. Booth Line = papers co-authored together A.M. Booth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1982154
2 1983136
3
Inhibition and facilitation in parasympathetic ganglia of the urinary bladder.
1980120
4 1989118
5 198372
6 198354
7 198536
8 198332
9 198929
10 197923
11 199922
12 200019
13 199819
14 198612
15
Effects of lidocaine on the excitability and membrane properties of the nerve cell soma.
19908
16 19892
17 19871
18 19941
19
Observations on chloroamphenicol with pentobarbital anesthesia in animals.
19701
20 20020

About A.M. Booth

A.M. Booth is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology, Molecular Biology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 21 papers that have together received 859 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (10 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (8 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (5 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (4 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (4 papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (3 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (3 papers) and Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (343 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (384 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (128 citations), Physiology (267 citations) and Equine (15 citations). A.M. Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include William C. de Groat, James R. Roppolo, Makoto Kawatani, Richard Milne, Janet R. Keast, Tadashi Hisamitsu, Irene P. Lowe, Karl B. Thor, William DeGroat and C. Morgan. Their work appears in journals such as Brain Research, Anesthesiology, Cell and Tissue Research, The Journal of Urology and American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact