J. C. E. Dekker

743 citations
36 papers · 459 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

J. C. E. Dekker

27 papers receiving 262 citations

Peers

J. C. E. Dekker
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 334
  • Geometry and Topology 120
  • Algebra and Number Theory 48
  • Mathematical Physics 45
  • Artificial Intelligence 145
Replace William W. Boone with:
William W. Boone United States
Jerome Malitz United States
Manuel Lerman United States
Sabine Koppelberg Germany
Louise Hay United States
C. J. Ash Australia
Raymond Balbes United States
E. S. Wolk United States
Matthias Schröder Germany
Harold Simmons United Kingdom
J. C. E. Dekker relative to William W. Boone United States William W. Boone's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
William W. Boone · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. C. E. Dekker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. C. E. Dekker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. C. E. Dekker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. C. E. Dekker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. C. E. Dekker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. C. E. Dekker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. C. E. Dekker. The network helps show where J. C. E. Dekker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside J. C. E. Dekker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. C. E. Dekker Line = papers co-authored together J. C. E. Dekker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Recursive Equivalence Types
196087
2 195461
3 195850
4 196440
5 195839
6 195825
7 195420
8 195319
9 197119
10 196914
11 195313
12 195510
13 195810
14 19718
15 19608
16
Les fonctions combinatoires et les isols
19667
17 19554
18 19744
19 19584
20 19703

About J. C. E. Dekker

J. C. E. Dekker is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Geometry and Topology, Artificial Intelligence, Algebra and Number Theory and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 36 papers that have together received 459 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Algebra and Logic (12 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (10 papers), Advanced Topology and Set Theory (6 papers), semigroups and automata theory (6 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (5 papers), Advanced Graph Theory Research (4 papers), graph theory and CDMA systems (3 papers) and Mathematics and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (334 citations), Geometry and Topology (120 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (48 citations), Mathematical Physics (45 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (145 citations). J. C. E. Dekker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Spain. Frequent co-authors include John Myhill, John Myhill, Erik Ellentuck, Steven J. Hulshoff, Marc Gerritsma and I. Akkerman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Symbolic Logic, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Mathematische Zeitschrift and Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact