C. J. Ash

1.0k citations
37 papers · 596 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

C. J. Ash

35 papers receiving 538 citations

Peers

C. J. Ash
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 553
  • Geometry and Topology 239
  • Mathematical Physics 72
  • Statistics and Probability 53
  • Algebra and Number Theory 29
Replace Manuel Lerman with:
Manuel Lerman United States
J. C. E. Dekker United States
Victor Selivanov Russia
Douglas Cenzer United States
William W. Boone United States
Sabine Koppelberg Germany
Erik Ellentuck United States
Alberto Marcone Italy
Reed Solomon United States
Martin Goldstern Austria
C. J. Ash relative to Manuel Lerman United States Manuel Lerman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Manuel Lerman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. J. Ash

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. J. Ash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. J. Ash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. J. Ash more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. J. Ash

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. J. Ash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. J. Ash. The network helps show where C. J. Ash may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside C. J. Ash, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. J. Ash Line = papers co-authored together C. J. Ash links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991100
2 198669
3 198741
4 198739
5 199039
6 198536
7 199035
8 198635
9 197529
10 199020
11 198416
12 199115
13 199213
14 199712
15 198610
16 19869
17 19949
18 19909
19 19927
20 19977

About C. J. Ash

C. J. Ash is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Geometry and Topology, Artificial Intelligence, Mathematical Physics and Algebra and Number Theory, having authored 37 papers that have together received 596 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Algebra and Logic (17 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (16 papers), semigroups and automata theory (15 papers), Advanced Topology and Set Theory (14 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (5 papers), Geometric and Algebraic Topology (4 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (3 papers) and Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (553 citations), Geometry and Topology (239 citations), Mathematical Physics (72 citations), Statistics and Probability (53 citations) and Algebra and Number Theory (29 citations). C. J. Ash has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Julia F. Knight, T. E. Hall, Carl G. Jockusch, Rodney G. Downey, Peter Cholak, Jean-Éric Pin, Jeffrey B. Remmel, Graham A. Worth and Anil Nerode. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, Journal of Symbolic Logic, Journal of the London Mathematical Society and The Journal of Chemical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact