Iwin Leenen

46 papers receiving 510 citations

Peers

Iwin Leenen
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Computational Mathematics 40
  • Family Practice 23
  • Applied Psychology 35
  • Management Science and Operations Research 80
  • General Decision Sciences 9
Replace Jorge N. Tendeiro with:
Jorge N. Tendeiro Netherlands
Nancy Wiggins United States
D.S.G. Pollock United Kingdom
David G. Weeks United States
Colin Chalmers United Kingdom
Michael J. Subkoviak United States
Akinori Okada Japan
Susan E. Whitely United States
Ab Mooijaart Netherlands
Edward E. Roskam Netherlands
Iwin Leenen relative to Jorge N. Tendeiro Netherlands Jorge N. Tendeiro's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.7×
Jorge N. Tendeiro · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Iwin Leenen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Iwin Leenen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Iwin Leenen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Iwin Leenen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Iwin Leenen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Iwin Leenen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Iwin Leenen. The network helps show where Iwin Leenen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Iwin Leenen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Iwin Leenen Line = papers co-authored together Iwin Leenen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201557
2 200748
3 201643
4 199935
5 201931
6 200329
7 200728
8 201524
9 200121
10
«Yo quiero, yo puedo…prevenir la violencia»: Programa breve de sensibilización sobre violencia en el noviazgo
201019
11 200718
12 202212
13 201612
14 201412
15 201611
16 20089
17 20149
18 20179
19 20019
20 20098

About Iwin Leenen

Iwin Leenen is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Artificial Intelligence, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Family Practice and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 49 papers that have together received 545 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (9 papers), Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (8 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (7 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (5 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (3 papers), Multi-Criteria Decision Making (3 papers), Tensor decomposition and applications (3 papers) and Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mathematics (40 citations), Family Practice (23 citations), Applied Psychology (35 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (80 citations) and General Decision Sciences (9 citations). Iwin Leenen has collaborated with scholars based in Mexico, Belgium and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Iven Van Mechelen, Vicente Ponsoda, Pedro M. Hontangas, Daniel Morillo, Francisco J. Abad, Martha Givaudan, Eva Ceulemans, Susan Pick, Jimmy de la Torre and Paul De Boeck. Their work appears in journals such as Psychometrika, Applied Psychological Measurement, Journal of Classification, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience and Journal of Applied Social Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact