I.S. Fraser

1.7k citations
15 papers · 707 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

I.S. Fraser

15 papers receiving 665 citations

Peers

I.S. Fraser
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Reproductive Medicine 452
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 357
  • Immunology 168
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 44
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 66
Replace Chandrasekhar Thota with:
Chandrasekhar Thota United States
Shaojie Ding China
Jinghua Shi China
Natsuko Tokushige Australia
Monique Sterrenburg Netherlands
Hector N. Aguilar Canada
Ricardo Pommer Chile
Hugo Maia Brazil
Check Jh United States
I.S. Fraser relative to Chandrasekhar Thota United States Chandrasekhar Thota's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Chandrasekhar Thota · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by I.S. Fraser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I.S. Fraser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I.S. Fraser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I.S. Fraser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I.S. Fraser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I.S. Fraser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I.S. Fraser. The network helps show where I.S. Fraser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside I.S. Fraser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with I.S. Fraser Line = papers co-authored together I.S. Fraser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2011111
2 2008105
3 2000103
4 201895
5
Efficacy of mefenamic acid in patients with a complaint of menorrhagia.
198182
6 198256
7
Long-term treatment of menorrhagia with mefenamic acid.
198343
8 200727
9 200926
10 201820
11 202110
12
Regulating menstrual bleeding. A prime function of progesterone.
199910
13 20098
14 19746
15 19785

About I.S. Fraser

I.S. Fraser is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Immunology, Surgery and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 15 papers that have together received 707 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometriosis Research and Treatment (8 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (5 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (3 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (2 papers), Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones (1 paper), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (1 paper), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (1 paper) and Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (452 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (357 citations), Immunology (168 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (44 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (66 citations). I.S. Fraser has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Marina Berbic, Robert Markham, Aiqing Li, Natsuko Tokushige, Rodney P. Shearman, Lang Tran, Paul Haber, Kirsten C. Morley, Andrew Baillie and Perry Elliott. Their work appears in journals such as Human Reproduction, Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, Fertility and Sterility, Journal of Reproductive Immunology and Addiction.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact