I.S. Fraser

1.7k citations
14 papers · 669 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

I.S. Fraser

14 papers receiving 636 citations

Peers

I.S. Fraser
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Reproductive Medicine 484
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 437
  • Immunology 211
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 58
  • Neurology 46
Replace Chandrasekhar Thota with:
Chandrasekhar Thota United States
Natalie Krajcir United States
J H Check United States
Jacquelyn S. Loughlin United States
Merel M. J. van den Berg Netherlands
Hugo Maia Brazil
C. Proto Italy
G Acker France
Y. Vrindts‐Gevaert Belgium
Antonio Palagiano Italy
I.S. Fraser relative to Chandrasekhar Thota United States Chandrasekhar Thota's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.7×
Chandrasekhar Thota · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by I.S. Fraser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I.S. Fraser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I.S. Fraser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I.S. Fraser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I.S. Fraser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I.S. Fraser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I.S. Fraser. The network helps show where I.S. Fraser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside I.S. Fraser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with I.S. Fraser Line = papers co-authored together I.S. Fraser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2011108
2 2008100
3 200096
4 201891
5
Efficacy of mefenamic acid in patients with a complaint of menorrhagia.
198178
6 198254
7
Long-term treatment of menorrhagia with mefenamic acid.
198338
8 200727
9 200925
10 201820
11
Regulating menstrual bleeding. A prime function of progesterone.
199910
12 20219
13 20098
14 19785

About I.S. Fraser

I.S. Fraser is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Immunology and Surgery, having authored 14 papers that have together received 669 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometriosis Research and Treatment (9 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (8 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (3 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (2 papers), Urticaria and Related Conditions (1 paper) and Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (484 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (437 citations), Immunology (211 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (58 citations) and Neurology (46 citations). I.S. Fraser has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Marina Berbic, Robert Markham, Aiqing Li, Natsuko Tokushige, Rodney P. Shearman, Lang Tran, Kirsten C. Morley, Paul Haber, Andrew Baillie and Perry Elliott. Their work appears in journals such as Human Reproduction, Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Journal of Reproductive Immunology and European Neuropsychopharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact