Glenys Dore

1.2k citations
22 papers · 922 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Glenys Dore

22 papers receiving 883 citations

Peers

Glenys Dore
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 188
  • Clinical Psychology 221
  • Neurology 153
  • Epidemiology 252
  • Applied Psychology 37
Replace Denis Murphy with:
Denis Murphy United Kingdom
Susan Quello United States
Andrew McBride United Kingdom
Joan Trujols Spain
Otto Lesch Austria
Oscar Bukstein United States
Peter Banys United States
Ngamwong Jarusuraisin Thailand
Paula Wilbourne United States
Larissa L. Loukianova United States
Glenys Dore relative to Denis Murphy United Kingdom Denis Murphy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Denis Murphy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Glenys Dore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Glenys Dore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Glenys Dore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Glenys Dore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Glenys Dore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Glenys Dore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Glenys Dore. The network helps show where Glenys Dore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Glenys Dore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Glenys Dore Line = papers co-authored together Glenys Dore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002123
2 2012116
3 2014109
4 2001109
5 201893
6 200193
7 201171
8 201137
9 200636
10 200525
11 201820
12 201417
13 201615
14 201514
15
Methadone maintenance treatment: outcomes from the Otago methadone programme.
19999
16 20157
17 20137
18 20066
19 20225
20 19964

About Glenys Dore

Glenys Dore is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Neurology, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 22 papers that have together received 922 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (6 papers), Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency (4 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (2 papers), Gambling Behavior and Treatments (1 paper), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper), Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper) and Mental Health and Patient Involvement (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (188 citations), Clinical Psychology (221 citations), Neurology (153 citations), Epidemiology (252 citations) and Applied Psychology (37 citations). Glenys Dore has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Noeline Latt, Sarah Romans, Simon J. Adamson, J. Douglas Sellman, John B. Saunders, John J. McGrath, David J. Kavanagh, P. F. Sullivan, Maree Teesson and Katherine L. Mills. Their work appears in journals such as Drug and Alcohol Review, Alcohol and Alcoholism, The Medical Journal of Australia, Cortex and Cognitive Neuropsychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact