Ingrid Gerner

29 papers receiving 939 citations

Peers

Ingrid Gerner
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Small Animals 504
  • Chemical Health and Safety 47
  • Dermatology 145
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 214
  • Pharmaceutical Science 91
Replace Julia H. Fentem with:
Julia H. Fentem United Kingdom
Valérie Zuang Italy
Martina Klarić Belgium
U. Pfannenbecker Germany
Silvia Casati Italy
Hajime Kojima Japan
Anna Lowit United States
S. Kalweit Germany
Frank Gerberick United States
L.K. Earl United Kingdom
Ingrid Gerner relative to Julia H. Fentem United Kingdom Julia H. Fentem's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Julia H. Fentem · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ingrid Gerner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ingrid Gerner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ingrid Gerner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ingrid Gerner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ingrid Gerner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ingrid Gerner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ingrid Gerner. The network helps show where Ingrid Gerner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ingrid Gerner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ingrid Gerner Line = papers co-authored together Ingrid Gerner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004176
2 199086
3 199378
4 199167
5 200363
6 200560
7 199859
8
Optimisation of the EpiDerm test protocol for the upcoming ECVAM validation study on in vitro skin irritation tests.
200446
9 200543
10 200741
11 200540
12 200539
13 200431
14 200231
15 199530
16 200429
17 200028
18
Validation project of alternatives for the Draize eye test.
198919
19 200018
20 199717

About Ingrid Gerner

Ingrid Gerner is a scholar working on Small Animals, Dermatology, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Pharmaceutical Science and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal testing and alternatives (22 papers), Contact Dermatitis and Allergies (9 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (7 papers), Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery (4 papers), Agricultural safety and regulations (3 papers), Chemistry and Chemical Engineering (3 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (3 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (504 citations), Chemical Health and Safety (47 citations), Dermatology (145 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (214 citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (91 citations). Ingrid Gerner has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Horst Spielmann, Manfred Liebsch, Eva Schlede, S. Kalweit, Etje Hulzebos, John D. Walker, Richard Vogel, Agnes Schulte, Ursula Gundert‐Remy and Martin D. Barratt. Their work appears in journals such as Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, Toxicology in Vitro, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, SAR and QSAR in environmental research and Toxicology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact