Arthur P. Walker
Impact in
- Small Animals top 0.5%
- Animal testing and alternatives
- Chemical Health and Safety top 5%
Papers in
-
- Animal testing and alternatives 11
- Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia 3
-
- Contact Dermatitis and Allergies 4
- Co-authors
- D.M. Bagley (4 shared papers)Ronald Marks (2 shared papers)Anthony D. Pearse (2 shared papers)Richard W. Lewis (4 shared papers)Robert Douglas Bruce (1 shared paper)R. C. Myers (1 shared paper)I. Chu (1 shared paper)Janet A. Springer (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Toxicology in Vitro (7 papers)Food and Chemical Toxicology (7 papers)Alternatives to Laboratory Animals (1 paper)British Journal of Dermatology (1 paper)Archives of Dermatological Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Arthur P. Walker
18 papers receiving 859 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
- Small Animals 498
- Chemical Health and Safety 17
- Dermatology 151
- Pharmaceutical Science 90
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 138
Countries citing papers authored by Arthur P. Walker
This map shows the geographic impact of Arthur P. Walker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Arthur P. Walker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arthur P. Walker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Arthur P. Walker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Arthur P. Walker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Arthur P. Walker. The network helps show where Arthur P. Walker may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Arthur P. Walker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1995 | 202 | |
| 2 | 1992 | 129 | |
| 3 | 1997 | 117 | |
| 4 | 1990 | 117 | |
| 5 | 1985 | 95 | |
| 6 | 1998 | 59 | |
| 7 | 1992 | 55 | |
| 8 | 1996 | 48 | |
| 9 | 1996 | 47 | |
| 10 | 1997 | 37 | |
| 11 | 1988 | 36 | |
| 12 | 1999 | 29 | |
| 13 | 1995 | 27 | |
| 14 | 1985 | 16 | |
| 15 | 1986 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1985 | 3 | |
| 17 | 1984 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1989 | 2 |
About Arthur P. Walker
Arthur P. Walker is a scholar working on Small Animals, Dermatology, Pharmaceutical Science, Food Science and Chemical Health and Safety, having authored 18 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal testing and alternatives (11 papers), Contact Dermatitis and Allergies (4 papers), Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery (3 papers), Agricultural safety and regulations (3 papers), Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia (3 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (2 papers), Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (2 papers) and Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (498 citations), Chemical Health and Safety (17 citations), Dermatology (151 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (90 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (138 citations). Arthur P. Walker has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include D.M. Bagley, Ronald Marks, Anthony D. Pearse, Richard W. Lewis, Robert Douglas Bruce, R. C. Myers, I. Chu, Janet A. Springer, Michael Goddard and Philip A. Botham. Their work appears in journals such as Toxicology in Vitro, Food and Chemical Toxicology, Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, British Journal of Dermatology and Archives of Dermatological Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.