Ingo E. Isphording

14 papers receiving 421 citations

Peers

Ingo E. Isphording
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Linguistics and Language 42
  • Modeling and Simulation 29
  • Education 143
  • Demography 50
  • Economics and Econometrics 106
Replace Alexander M. Danzer with:
Alexander M. Danzer Germany
Gabriella C. Gonzalez United States
Stephanie A. Bohon United States
Yuliya Kosyakova Germany
Mieke T. A. Lopes Cardozo Netherlands
Marie McAuliffe Australia
Silvia Marcu Spain
Salvatore Strozza Italy
Katharina Natter Netherlands
Özge Bilgili Netherlands
Ingo E. Isphording relative to Alexander M. Danzer Germany Alexander M. Danzer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.7×
Alexander M. Danzer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ingo E. Isphording

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ingo E. Isphording's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ingo E. Isphording with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ingo E. Isphording more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ingo E. Isphording

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ingo E. Isphording. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ingo E. Isphording. The network helps show where Ingo E. Isphording may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Ingo E. Isphording, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ingo E. Isphording Line = papers co-authored together Ingo E. Isphording links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 201693
2 201384
3 202164
4 201642
5 201738
6 201328
7 202124
8 201424
9 201914
10 202210
11 20209
12 20234
13 20212
14
Auswirkungen des gesetzlichen Mindestlohns auf Löhne und Arbeitszeiten: Studie im Auftrag der Mindestlohnkommission
20201
15 20230
16 20250
17 20240

About Ingo E. Isphording

Ingo E. Isphording is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Modeling and Simulation, Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies and Clinical Psychology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 437 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include COVID-19 epidemiological studies (3 papers), Economic Policies and Impacts (3 papers), School Choice and Performance (3 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (3 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (3 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (2 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (2 papers) and Social Policy and Reform Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (42 citations), Modeling and Simulation (29 citations), Education (143 citations), Demography (50 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (106 citations). Ingo E. Isphording has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Benjamin Elsner, Sebastian Otten, Nico Pestel, A. F. CLARKE, Zölitz Ulf, Arnaud Chevalier, Reyn J. G. van Ewijk, Ulf Rinne, Holger Bonin and Andreas Lichter. Their work appears in journals such as Labour Economics, Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, Review of International Economics, The Journal of Human Resources and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact