Ing‐Jun Chen

652 citations
27 papers · 591 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Ing‐Jun Chen

27 papers receiving 577 citations

Peers

Ing‐Jun Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Sensory Systems 35
  • Toxicology 21
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 50
  • Biochemistry 41
  • Pharmacology 92
Replace H Ozaki with:
H Ozaki Japan
Woineshet J. Zenebe United States
Koji Ueshima Japan
Osamu Cynshi Japan
Hongwei Si China
Seon A Lee South Korea
F. Carpenedo Italy
Tatsuya Kusudo Japan
Chiu‐Yin Kwan Canada
Caner Günaydın Türkiye
Ing‐Jun Chen relative to H Ozaki Japan H Ozaki's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
H Ozaki · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ing‐Jun Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ing‐Jun Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ing‐Jun Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ing‐Jun Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ing‐Jun Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ing‐Jun Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ing‐Jun Chen. The network helps show where Ing‐Jun Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ing‐Jun Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ing‐Jun Chen Line = papers co-authored together Ing‐Jun Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200266
2 200264
3 201144
4 201040
5 200437
6 200830
7 200426
8 201026
9 200026
10 199524
11 201224
12 200320
13 201019
14 199417
15 200017
16 200015
17 200114
18 199814
19 200314
20 200613

About Ing‐Jun Chen

Ing‐Jun Chen is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Physiology, Pharmacology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 27 papers that have together received 591 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (8 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (5 papers), Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects (5 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (4 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (3 papers), Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology (3 papers), Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis (3 papers) and Flavonoids in Medical Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (35 citations), Toxicology (21 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (50 citations), Biochemistry (41 citations) and Pharmacology (92 citations). Ing‐Jun Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, Czechia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jwu‐Lai Yeh, Jyh‐Chong Liang, Yi‐Ching Lo, Jong‐Hau Hsu, Che‐Ming Teng, Chun-Nan Lin, Jaw‐Jou Kang, Sheng‐Nan Wu, Yang‐Chang Wu and Yaw‐Bin Huang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, Life Sciences, Toxicology and Atherosclerosis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact