Inge Schreyer

557 citations
9 papers · 351 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Inge Schreyer

8 papers receiving 295 citations

Peers

Inge Schreyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 27
  • Education 271
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 77
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 44
  • Social Psychology 63
Replace Annemie Schepens with:
Annemie Schepens Belgium
Lennie Barblett Australia
Pamela Oberhuemer United Kingdom
Loraine McKay Australia
Colette Deaudelin Canada
Gale Macleod United Kingdom
Shereen Benjamin United Kingdom
Carrie Birmingham United States
Laura Aleni Sestito Italy
Neil Hufton United Kingdom
Inge Schreyer relative to Annemie Schepens Belgium Annemie Schepens's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Annemie Schepens · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Inge Schreyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Inge Schreyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inge Schreyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inge Schreyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Inge Schreyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inge Schreyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inge Schreyer. The network helps show where Inge Schreyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Inge Schreyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Inge Schreyer Line = papers co-authored together Inge Schreyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2010113
2 201090
3
Metaanalyse des Zusammenhangs von Interesse und schulischer Leistung
199354
4
Intrinsische Lernmotivation und Lernen : ein Überblick zu Ergebnissen der Forschung
199440
5 201638
6 20156
7 20106
8 20124
9 20240

About Inge Schreyer

Inge Schreyer is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Education, Social Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 351 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sociology and Education Studies (4 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (2 papers), Education Methods and Technologies (1 paper), Corporate Management and Leadership (1 paper), Innovation, Technology, and Society (1 paper), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (1 paper), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (1 paper) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human Factors and Ergonomics (27 citations), Education (271 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (77 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (44 citations) and Social Psychology (63 citations). Frequent co-authors include Pamela Oberhuemer, Michelle J. Neuman, Ulrich Schiefele, Martín Krause and Andreas Krapp. Their work appears in journals such as Early Years Journal of International Research and Development, publish.UP (University of Potsdam), Frühe Bildung and Verlag Barbara Budrich eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact