Inés Mato
Impact in
- Insect Science top 2%
- Bee Products Chemical Analysis
- Insect and Pesticide Research
- Biochemistry top 5%
- Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
Papers in
-
- Bee Products Chemical Analysis 15
- Insect and Pesticide Research 15
- Food Science 10
- Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity 8
- Co-authors
- José F. Huidobro (18 shared papers)Silvia Suárez-Luque (10 shared papers)M. Teresa Sancho (12 shared papers)J. Simal‐Lozano (12 shared papers)Soledad Muniategui‐Lorenzo (5 shared papers)Marivel Sánchez (4 shared papers)Miguel A. Fernández‐Muiño (4 shared papers)J.C. García-Monteagudo (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Inés Mato
22 papers receiving 783 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Insect Science 355
- Biochemistry 147
- Food Science 336
- Analytical Chemistry 76
- Spectroscopy 124
Countries citing papers authored by Inés Mato
This map shows the geographic impact of Inés Mato's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inés Mato with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inés Mato more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Inés Mato
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inés Mato. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inés Mato. The network helps show where Inés Mato may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Inés Mato, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 192 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 106 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 97 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 80 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 78 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 39 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 39 | |
| 8 | 1997 | 28 | |
| 9 | 2000 | 27 | |
| 10 | 2002 | 24 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 24 | |
| 12 | 1998 | 18 | |
| 13 | 1998 | 18 | |
| 14 | 2006 | 16 | |
| 15 | 2005 | 12 | |
| 16 | 2005 | 12 | |
| 17 | 2001 | 7 | |
| 18 | 2002 | 6 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 20 | Fumaric acid as a possible discriminant parameter of geographical origin of honey samples | 2004 | 3 |
About Inés Mato
Inés Mato is a scholar working on Insect Science, Food Science, Biomedical Engineering, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Spectroscopy, having authored 23 papers that have together received 833 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bee Products Chemical Analysis (15 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (15 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (8 papers), Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (4 papers), Plant and animal studies (3 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (3 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (2 papers) and Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (355 citations), Biochemistry (147 citations), Food Science (336 citations), Analytical Chemistry (76 citations) and Spectroscopy (124 citations). Inés Mato has collaborated with scholars based in Spain and Nigeria. Frequent co-authors include José F. Huidobro, Silvia Suárez-Luque, M. Teresa Sancho, J. Simal‐Lozano, Soledad Muniategui‐Lorenzo, Marivel Sánchez, Miguel A. Fernández‐Muiño, J.C. García-Monteagudo, Husein Abdul-Hamid and Bridget Bwalya Umar. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Food Chemistry, Journal of Chromatography A, Deutsche Lebensmittel-Rundschau and Food Research International.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.