Deutsche Lebensmittel-Rundschau

266 papers and 1.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 266 papers published in Deutsche Lebensmittel-Rundschau in the last decades have received a total of 1.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Deutsche Lebensmittel-Rundschau usually cover Food Science (85 papers), Plant Science (48 papers) and Molecular Biology (37 papers) specifically the topics of Meat and Animal Product Quality (28 papers), Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (27 papers) and Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (22 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Deutsche Lebensmittel-Rundschau are Marijan Šeruga, Martina Medvidović‐Kosanović, Lidija Jakobek, Birgit Gutsche, Rüdiger Weißhaar, Ivana Novak, Roland Franz, Reinhard Schubring, Dirk W. Lachenmeier and Barakat S.M. Mahmoud.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Deutsche Lebensmittel-Rundschau

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Deutsche Lebensmittel-Rundschau. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Deutsche Lebensmittel-Rundschau.

Countries where authors publish in Deutsche Lebensmittel-Rundschau

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Deutsche Lebensmittel-Rundschau. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Deutsche Lebensmittel-Rundschau with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deutsche Lebensmittel-Rundschau more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025