Ines Kath

1.0k citations
23 papers · 529 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Ines Kath

23 papers receiving 476 citations

Peers

Ines Kath
Comparison fields: 5 of 17
  • Geometry and Topology 341
  • Applied Mathematics 377
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 258
  • Mathematical Physics 134
  • Algebra and Number Theory 56
Replace David M. J. Calderbank with:
David M. J. Calderbank United Kingdom
Andrew Swann Denmark
D. V. Alekseevskiĭ
Jorge Lauret Argentina
Helga Baum Germany
Uwe Semmelmann Germany
McKenzie Y. Wang Canada
Olivier Biquard France
Anna Fino Italy
Andrei Moroianu France
Ines Kath relative to David M. J. Calderbank United Kingdom David M. J. Calderbank's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
David M. J. Calderbank · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ines Kath

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ines Kath's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ines Kath with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ines Kath more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ines Kath

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ines Kath. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ines Kath. The network helps show where Ines Kath may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Ines Kath, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ines Kath Line = papers co-authored together Ines Kath links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Twistors and killing spinors on Riemannian manifolds
1991167
2 1997119
3 199049
4 198946
5 199919
6 200316
7 200915
8 199814
9 200313
10 200012
11 200612
12 200210
13 20009
14 19906
15 19966
16 20075
17 20133
18 20112
19 20182
20 20111

About Ines Kath

Ines Kath is a scholar working on Applied Mathematics, Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Algebra and Number Theory, having authored 23 papers that have together received 529 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows (14 papers), Geometry and complex manifolds (12 papers), Advanced Differential Geometry Research (7 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (7 papers), Mathematical Analysis and Transform Methods (4 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (4 papers), Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (3 papers) and Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (341 citations), Applied Mathematics (377 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (258 citations), Mathematical Physics (134 citations) and Algebra and Number Theory (56 citations). Ines Kath has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, France and Luxembourg. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Friedrich, Helga Baum, Ralf Grunewald, Andrei Moroianu, Uwe Semmelmann, Th. Friedrich, Martin Olbrich, Felix Finster, Abdelghani Zeghib and Anna Fino. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Geometry and Physics, Transformation Groups, Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal), Annals of Global Analysis and Geometry and Journal of the London Mathematical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact