Inés Gil

509 citations
24 papers · 281 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Inés Gil

22 papers receiving 269 citations

Peers

Inés Gil
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 89
  • Oncology 73
  • Genetics 28
  • Surgery 107
  • Hematology 26
Replace E. Rosa Rizzotto with:
E. Rosa Rizzotto Italy
Jun Higaki Japan
GJ Webster United Kingdom
Elizabeth Sinclair Australia
Dimitrios Dardamanis Greece
İşılay Nadir Türkiye
Jerzy Lubikowski Poland
S. Fava Italy
Nora Bettinardi Italy
Katarzyna Krzanowska Poland
Inés Gil relative to E. Rosa Rizzotto Italy E. Rosa Rizzotto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
E. Rosa Rizzotto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Inés Gil

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Inés Gil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inés Gil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inés Gil more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Inés Gil

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inés Gil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inés Gil. The network helps show where Inés Gil may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Inés Gil, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Inés Gil Line = papers co-authored together Inés Gil links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202049
2 201243
3 200629
4 199721
5 202019
6 201819
7 201018
8 199714
9 201511
10 201710
11 201410
12 19878
13 20157
14 20224
15 20094
16 20184
17 20224
18 20172
19 20162
20 20211

About Inés Gil

Inés Gil is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Rheumatology and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 24 papers that have together received 281 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (4 papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (3 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (3 papers), Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (3 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (2 papers), Diverticular Disease and Complications (2 papers), Moyamoya disease diagnosis and treatment (2 papers) and Pneumothorax, Barotrauma, Emphysema (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (89 citations), Oncology (73 citations), Genetics (28 citations), Surgery (107 citations) and Hematology (26 citations). Inés Gil has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Spain and United States. Frequent co-authors include Hwei Jene Ng, Ahmad H. M. Nassar, Arkadiusz Peter Wysocki, Luís Bujanda, Ángel Cosme, Cristina Sarasqueta, M.A. De Gregorio, Maria Aparecida Eiko Noguti, Luis Piñeiro and Vânia M. Morelli. Their work appears in journals such as British journal of surgery, Surgical Endoscopy, Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, Digestive Diseases and Sciences and United European Gastroenterology Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact