Sandra Amado

36 papers receiving 763 citations

Peers

Sandra Amado
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 427
  • Biomaterials 224
  • Developmental Neuroscience 57
  • Genetics 126
  • Rehabilitation 73
Replace Paulo Armada-da-Silva with:
Paulo Armada-da-Silva Portugal
Changfeng Lu China
Federica Fregnan Italy
Rui Alvites Portugal
Sami Tuffaha United States
Ana Lúcia Luís Portugal
Qingtang Zhu China
Tessa Gordon Canada
Wenrui Qu China
Olivier Alluin France
Sandra Amado relative to Paulo Armada-da-Silva Portugal Paulo Armada-da-Silva's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Paulo Armada-da-Silva · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sandra Amado

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sandra Amado's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sandra Amado with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sandra Amado more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sandra Amado

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sandra Amado. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sandra Amado. The network helps show where Sandra Amado may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sandra Amado, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sandra Amado Line = papers co-authored together Sandra Amado links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008110
2 2007100
3 200764
4 201854
5 200841
6 201041
7 201435
8 200833
9 202133
10 201432
11 201331
12
Evaluation of two biodegradable nerve guides for the reconstruction of the rat sciatic nerve.
200726
13 201024
14 201723
15 202021
16 201121
17 201820
18 201115
19 201513
20 201013

About Sandra Amado

Sandra Amado is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, Rehabilitation and Biomaterials, having authored 36 papers that have together received 799 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nerve injury and regeneration (15 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (6 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (5 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (5 papers), Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (4 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (4 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (3 papers) and Mesenchymal stem cell research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (427 citations), Biomaterials (224 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (57 citations), Genetics (126 citations) and Rehabilitation (73 citations). Sandra Amado has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Italy and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ana Colette Maurício, António Veloso, Paulo Armada-da-Silva, Ana Lúcia Luís, Stefano Geuna, Artur S.P. Varejão, José D. Santos, Stefania Raimondo, Federica Fregnan and Maria José Simões. Their work appears in journals such as Microsurgery, Reviews in the Neurosciences, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology and Polymers.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact