Ina Bartnik
Impact in
- Cell Biology top 10%
- Biotin and Related Studies
- Cellular transport and secretion
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Papers in
-
- Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways 2
- RNA Research and Splicing 1
- RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms 1
-
- Click Chemistry and Applications 2
- Co-authors
- Susanne tom Dieck (5 shared papers)Erin M. Schuman (5 shared papers)Belquis Nassim-Assir (4 shared papers)Cyril Hanus (2 shared papers)David A. Tirrell (2 shared papers)Caspar Glock (2 shared papers)Daniela C. Dieterich (2 shared papers)Sakshi Garg (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Nature Methods (1 paper)Neurobiology of Learning and Memory (1 paper)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)Nature Biotechnology (1 paper)Current Protocols in Cell Biology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesArgentina
In The Last Decade
Ina Bartnik
5 papers receiving 531 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Cell Biology 122
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 118
- Molecular Biology 421
- Neurology 30
- Biological Psychiatry 9
Countries citing papers authored by Ina Bartnik
This map shows the geographic impact of Ina Bartnik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ina Bartnik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ina Bartnik more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ina Bartnik
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ina Bartnik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ina Bartnik. The network helps show where Ina Bartnik may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ina Bartnik, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 210 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 146 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 89 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 75 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 13 |
About Ina Bartnik
Ina Bartnik is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry, Cell Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 5 papers that have together received 533 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Click Chemistry and Applications (2 papers), Biotin and Related Studies (2 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (2 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (1 paper), RNA Research and Splicing (1 paper), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (1 paper), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (1 paper) and RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (122 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (118 citations), Molecular Biology (421 citations), Neurology (30 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (9 citations). Ina Bartnik has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Argentina. Frequent co-authors include Susanne tom Dieck, Erin M. Schuman, Belquis Nassim-Assir, Cyril Hanus, David A. Tirrell, Caspar Glock, Daniela C. Dieterich, Sakshi Garg, Stefanie Bunse and Thorsten Mosler. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Methods, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Biotechnology and Current Protocols in Cell Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.