Imre Máthé
Impact in
- Biochemistry top 2%
- Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
-
- Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis
Papers in
- Food Science 33
- Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity 26
-
- Phytochemistry and Biological Activities 41
- Co-authors
- Judit Hohmann (30 shared papers)Gábor Janicsák (20 shared papers)István Zupkó (12 shared papers)Gerald Blunden (20 shared papers)György Falkay (4 shared papers)Dóra Rédei (6 shared papers)Katalin Veres (13 shared papers)Péter Forgó (13 shared papers)
- Journals
- Planta Medica (14 papers)Natural Product Communications (8 papers)Journal of Natural Products (7 papers)Phytochemistry (5 papers)Phytotherapy Research (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- HungaryUnited KingdomSlovakia
In The Last Decade
Imre Máthé
94 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Biochemistry 325
- Complementary and alternative medicine 324
- Food Science 695
- Pharmacology 241
- Plant Science 1.1k
Countries citing papers authored by Imre Máthé
This map shows the geographic impact of Imre Máthé's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Imre Máthé with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Imre Máthé more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Imre Máthé
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Imre Máthé. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Imre Máthé. The network helps show where Imre Máthé may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Imre Máthé, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 95 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1999 | 169 | |
| 2 | 2001 | 115 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 111 | |
| 4 | 1999 | 111 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 98 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 78 | |
| 7 | 2002 | 71 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 52 | |
| 9 | 1997 | 50 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 50 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 48 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 47 | |
| 13 | 1999 | 41 | |
| 14 | 1999 | 40 | |
| 15 | 1997 | 37 | |
| 16 | 1996 | 36 | |
| 17 | 1999 | 34 | |
| 18 | 1992 | 33 | |
| 19 | 2014 | 33 | |
| 20 | 2011 | 28 |
About Imre Máthé
Imre Máthé is a scholar working on Food Science, Plant Science, Complementary and alternative medicine, Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, having authored 95 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (41 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (32 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (26 papers), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (13 papers), Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies (10 papers), Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis (10 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (7 papers) and Bioactive Natural Diterpenoids Research (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (325 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (324 citations), Food Science (695 citations), Pharmacology (241 citations) and Plant Science (1.1k citations). Imre Máthé has collaborated with scholars based in Hungary, United Kingdom and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include Judit Hohmann, Gábor Janicsák, István Zupkó, Gerald Blunden, György Falkay, Dóra Rédei, Katalin Veres, Péter Forgó, Zsuzsanna Hajdú and Erzsébet Háznagy‐Radnai. Their work appears in journals such as Planta Medica, Natural Product Communications, Journal of Natural Products, Phytochemistry and Phytotherapy Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.