Phytotherapy Research

8.2k papers and 258.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 8.2k papers published in Phytotherapy Research in the last decades have received a total of 258.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Phytotherapy Research usually cover Molecular Biology (3.1k papers), Plant Science (2.1k papers) and Pharmacology (1.7k papers) specifically the topics of Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (820 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (743 papers) and Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (711 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Phytotherapy Research are Hossein Hosseinzadeh, Franz Bučar, Amr E. Edris, Marjan Nassiri‐Asl, Anwarul Hassan Gilani, Amirhossein Sahebkar, Mehrdad Iranshahi, Gerald Blunden, Badreldin H. Ali and Jeffrey B. Blumberg.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Phytotherapy Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Phytotherapy Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Phytotherapy Research.

Countries where authors publish in Phytotherapy Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Phytotherapy Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Phytotherapy Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phytotherapy Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025