Tamás Rédei
Impact in
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Ecological Modeling top 10%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
Papers in
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 19
-
- Botany and Plant Ecology Studies 18
- Botanical Studies and Applications 2
- Co-authors
- Anikó Csecserits (22 shared papers)Zoltán Botta‐Dukát (13 shared papers)Melinda Halassy (9 shared papers)Miklós Kertész (6 shared papers)Barbara Lhotsky (8 shared papers)Katalin Szitár (8 shared papers)György Kröel‐Dulay (4 shared papers)E. Kovács-Láng (4 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Tamás Rédei
33 papers receiving 755 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 442
- Ecological Modeling 59
- Plant Science 389
- Ecology 268
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 197
Countries citing papers authored by Tamás Rédei
This map shows the geographic impact of Tamás Rédei's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tamás Rédei with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tamás Rédei more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tamás Rédei
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tamás Rédei. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tamás Rédei. The network helps show where Tamás Rédei may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tamás Rédei, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 95 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 76 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 74 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 73 | |
| 5 | 2001 | 72 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 72 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 48 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 39 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 28 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 28 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 28 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 24 | |
| 13 | 2007 | 24 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 19 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 15 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 12 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 11 | |
| 18 | 2003 | 10 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 6 |
About Tamás Rédei
Tamás Rédei is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science, Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 35 papers that have together received 790 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (19 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (18 papers), Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (7 papers), Plant and animal studies (6 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (3 papers), Bryophyte Studies and Records (3 papers), Pasture and Agricultural Systems (2 papers) and Botanical Studies and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (442 citations), Ecological Modeling (59 citations), Plant Science (389 citations), Ecology (268 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (197 citations). Tamás Rédei has collaborated with scholars based in Hungary, Romania and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Anikó Csecserits, Zoltán Botta‐Dukát, Melinda Halassy, Miklós Kertész, Barbara Lhotsky, Katalin Szitár, György Kröel‐Dulay, E. Kovács-Láng, Judit Hohmann and Boglárka Csupor‐Löffler. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Vegetation Science, Community Ecology, Global Ecology and Conservation, Phytotherapy Research and Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.