Ignacio Correa‐Velez

79 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Ignacio Correa‐Velez
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
  • Clinical Psychology 861
  • Family Practice 36
  • General Health Professions 337
  • Sociology and Political Science 641
  • Public Administration 47
Replace Amélie Perron with:
Amélie Perron Canada
India J. Ornelas United States
Mary K. Canales United States
Janice Chesters Australia
Jeremy Segrott United Kingdom
Maya Shaha Switzerland
Donna Cormack New Zealand
Martha MacLeod Canada
Jane V. Appleton United Kingdom
Fiona Irvine United Kingdom
Ignacio Correa‐Velez relative to Amélie Perron Canada Amélie Perron's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Amélie Perron · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ignacio Correa‐Velez

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ignacio Correa‐Velez's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ignacio Correa‐Velez with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ignacio Correa‐Velez more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ignacio Correa‐Velez

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ignacio Correa‐Velez. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ignacio Correa‐Velez. The network helps show where Ignacio Correa‐Velez may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ignacio Correa‐Velez, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ignacio Correa‐Velez Line = papers co-authored together Ignacio Correa‐Velez links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 82 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006105
2 201592
3 201388
4 201188
5 200880
6 201263
7 200759
8 201758
9 200558
10 200954
11 201853
12 200347
13 201647
14 200546
15 201645
16 201341
17 201439
18 201436
19 201834
20 201534

About Ignacio Correa‐Velez

Ignacio Correa‐Velez is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Education and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 82 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migration, Health and Trauma (52 papers), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (19 papers), Education and experiences of immigrants and refugees (16 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (13 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (7 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (6 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (6 papers) and Medication Adherence and Compliance (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (861 citations), Family Practice (36 citations), General Health Professions (337 citations), Sociology and Political Science (641 citations) and Public Administration (47 citations). Ignacio Correa‐Velez has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Malta. Frequent co-authors include Sandra M. Gifford, Celia McMichael, Adrian Barnett, Mark Brough, Caitlin Nunn, Robyn Sampson, Kate Murray, Julie King, Alexandra Clavarino and Mark Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Refugee Studies, International Journal of Integrated Care, The Medical Journal of Australia, PLoS ONE and Women and Birth.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact