Ian Cross

89 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Ian Cross
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • Music 505
  • Developmental Biology 144
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.2k
  • Signal Processing 420
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 438
Replace David Huron with:
David Huron United States
Michael J. Hove United States
Martin Clayton United Kingdom
Psyche Loui United States
Erin E. Hannon United States
Joel S. Snyder United States
Richard Parncutt Austria
Daniel Müllensiefen United Kingdom
Adam Tierney United Kingdom
Laura K. Cirelli Canada
Ian Cross relative to David Huron United States David Huron's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
David Huron · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ian Cross

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ian Cross's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian Cross with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian Cross more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ian Cross

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian Cross. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian Cross. The network helps show where Ian Cross may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ian Cross, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ian Cross Line = papers co-authored together Ian Cross links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 99 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012223
2 2001210
3
Representing musical structure
1991129
4 2013105
5 2014103
6
Is music the most important thing we ever did? Music, development and evolution
199971
7 200971
8 199671
9 200867
10 201055
11 201647
12 201147
13 200143
14 200338
15 200732
16 200329
17 200026
18 201225
19 202022
20 199422

About Ian Cross

Ian Cross is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Signal Processing, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology and Music, having authored 99 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Music Perception (63 papers), Music and Audio Processing (27 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (16 papers), Music Technology and Sound Studies (16 papers), Diverse Music Education Insights (13 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (7 papers), Language and cultural evolution (7 papers) and Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Music (505 citations), Developmental Biology (144 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.2k citations), Signal Processing (420 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (438 citations). Ian Cross has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Tal-Chen Rabinowitch, Pamela Burnard, Peter Howell, Robert West, Martin Rohrmeier, Matthew Woolhouse, Patrick Rebuschat, Iréne Deliège, Susan Hallam and Michael H. Thaut. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology of Music, Music Perception An Interdisciplinary Journal, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Musicae Scientiae and Frontiers in Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact