I. Phocas

45 papers receiving 486 citations

Peers

I. Phocas
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 71
  • Reproductive Medicine 79
  • Immunology 84
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 62
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 93
Replace Keiji Sakai with:
Keiji Sakai Japan
Andrzej Malinowski Poland
Guy E. Ringler United States
Laurence Brown United Kingdom
P Pystynen Finland
Michaele Hartmann Austria
Jorge Las Heras Canada
J. Schmolling Germany
Takashi Kitanaka Japan
Aydın Özsaran Türkiye
I. Phocas relative to Keiji Sakai Japan Keiji Sakai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Keiji Sakai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by I. Phocas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I. Phocas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I. Phocas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I. Phocas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I. Phocas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I. Phocas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I. Phocas. The network helps show where I. Phocas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside I. Phocas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with I. Phocas Line = papers co-authored together I. Phocas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199834
2 199127
3 200027
4 199223
5 199822
6 199221
7 199920
8 198919
9 200119
10 199219
11 199718
12 200017
13 199212
14 199012
15
A comparative study of serum alpha-beta A immunoreactive inhibin and tumor-associated antigens CA125 and CEA in ovarian cancer.
199712
16 199011
17 200011
18 199511
19 199111
20 200010

About I. Phocas

I. Phocas is a scholar working on Immunology, Reproductive Medicine, Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Oncology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 504 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian function and disorders (7 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (7 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (5 papers), Sexual Differentiation and Disorders (5 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (4 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (4 papers), Pregnancy and Medication Impact (4 papers) and Cancer Risks and Factors (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (71 citations), Reproductive Medicine (79 citations), Immunology (84 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (62 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (93 citations). I. Phocas has collaborated with scholars based in Greece, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Angeliki Sarandakou, Demetrios Rizos, D. Rizos, P.A. Zourlas, Efthymia Protonotariou, Themis Mantzavinos, A. Kontoravdis, A. Malamitsi‐Puchner, N. Poulakis and A. Chryssikopoulos. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, Pediatric Research and Early Human Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact