Hung‐Wei Kan

23 papers receiving 568 citations

Peers

Hung‐Wei Kan
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Biological Psychiatry 26
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 25
  • Physiology 145
  • Cell Biology 88
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 87
Replace Suaad Ahmed with:
Suaad Ahmed Ireland
Keiko Morimoto Japan
Patrick Osei‐Owusu United States
Gergely Berta Hungary
Tracey J. Nickola United States
Rajaneesh K. Gupta India
Jian Feng China
Shaona Acharjee Canada
Boram Ham Canada
Gabriella Horváth Canada
Hung‐Wei Kan relative to Suaad Ahmed Ireland Suaad Ahmed's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Suaad Ahmed · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hung‐Wei Kan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hung‐Wei Kan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hung‐Wei Kan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hung‐Wei Kan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hung‐Wei Kan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hung‐Wei Kan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hung‐Wei Kan. The network helps show where Hung‐Wei Kan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hung‐Wei Kan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hung‐Wei Kan Line = papers co-authored together Hung‐Wei Kan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201072
2 201968
3 201553
4 201552
5 202244
6 201940
7 201840
8 201133
9 201828
10 201820
11 201618
12 202217
13 201716
14 201814
15 202312
16 201911
17 202210
18 202110
19 20187
20 20186

About Hung‐Wei Kan

Hung‐Wei Kan is a scholar working on Physiology, Molecular Biology, Neurology, Cell Biology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 24 papers that have together received 581 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (9 papers), Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes (6 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (4 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (3 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (2 papers), Cellular transport and secretion (2 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers) and Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (26 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (25 citations), Physiology (145 citations), Cell Biology (88 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (87 citations). Hung‐Wei Kan has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Sung‐Tsang Hsieh, Chi‐Chao Chao, Yu‐Cheng Ho, Yu‐Lin Hsieh, Wei‐Hao Peng, Betty A. Wu‐Hsieh, Hao Chiang, Ming Tatt Lee, Cheng‐Chun Wu and Ming‐Jen Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Neurology, Human Molecular Genetics, Molecular Neurobiology, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications and European Journal of Pain.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact