Henry Chesbrough
Impact in
- Management of Technology and Innovation top 0.01%
- Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
- Strategy and Management top 0.01%
- Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Business Strategy and Innovation
- Digital Platforms and Economics
Papers in
-
- Innovation and Knowledge Management 46
- Business Strategy and Innovation 14
-
- Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences 12
- Co-authors
- Ellen Enkel (3 shared papers)Oliver Gassmann (2 shared papers)Marcel Bogers (17 shared papers)Melissa M. Appleyard (2 shared papers)Jim Spohrer (1 shared paper)Wim Vanhaverbeke (2 shared papers)Sabine Brunswicker (3 shared papers)Joel West (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- California Management Review (22 papers)Research-Technology Management (13 papers)R and D Management (9 papers)Research Policy (3 papers)Communications of the ACM (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesDenmarkItaly
In The Last Decade
Henry Chesbrough
115 papers receiving 26.6k citations
Henry Chesbrough's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 176
- Management of Technology and Innovation 8.6k
- Strategy and Management 18.2k
- Business and International Management 2.2k
- Computer Science Applications 4.4k
- Marketing 5.1k
Countries citing papers authored by Henry Chesbrough
This map shows the geographic impact of Henry Chesbrough's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Henry Chesbrough with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Henry Chesbrough more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Henry Chesbrough
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Henry Chesbrough. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Henry Chesbrough. The network helps show where Henry Chesbrough may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Henry Chesbrough, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 115 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology Hit paper breakdown → | 2003 | 6034 |
| 2 | The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox Corporation's technology spin-off companies Hit paper breakdown → | 2002 | 2695 |
| 3 | Business Model Innovation: Opportunities and Barriers Hit paper breakdown → | 2009 | 2374 |
| 4 | The Era of Open Innovation Hit paper breakdown → | 2003 | 1545 |
| 5 | Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape Hit paper breakdown → | 2006 | 1422 |
| 6 | Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries Hit paper breakdown → | 2006 | 1337 |
| 7 | Open R&D and open innovation: exploring the phenomenon Hit paper breakdown → | 2009 | 1306 |
| 8 | The future of open innovation Hit paper breakdown → | 2010 | 1122 |
| 9 | Business model innovation: it's not just about technology anymore Hit paper breakdown → | 2007 | 996 |
| 10 | Open Innovation and Strategy Hit paper breakdown → | 2007 | 842 |
| 11 | A research manifesto for services science Hit paper breakdown → | 2006 | 620 |
| 12 | Open innovation: The next decade Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 601 |
| 13 | The Logic of Open Innovation: Managing Intellectual Property Hit paper breakdown → | 2003 | 597 |
| 14 | Why Companies Should Have Open Business Models Hit paper breakdown → | 2007 | 565 |
| 15 | Open Innovation: Research, Practices, and Policies Hit paper breakdown → | 2018 | 501 |
| 16 | To recover faster from Covid-19, open up: Managerial implications from an open innovation perspective Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 425 |
| 17 | Explicating Open Innovation: Clarifying an Emerging Paradigm for Understanding Innovation Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 423 |
| 18 | Open Innovation: Where We've Been and Where We're Going Hit paper breakdown → | 2012 | 364 |
| 19 | Strategic Management of Open Innovation: A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective Hit paper breakdown → | 2019 | 331 |
| 20 | Engaging with Startups to Enhance Corporate Innovation Hit paper breakdown → | 2015 | 330 |
About Henry Chesbrough
Henry Chesbrough is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Management of Technology and Innovation, Computer Science Applications, Economics and Econometrics and Accounting, having authored 115 papers that have together received 29.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (46 papers), Open Source Software Innovations (24 papers), Private Equity and Venture Capital (17 papers), Business Strategy and Innovation (14 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (12 papers), Innovation Policy and R&D (11 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (9 papers) and Knowledge Management and Sharing (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (8.6k citations), Strategy and Management (18.2k citations), Business and International Management (2.2k citations), Computer Science Applications (4.4k citations) and Marketing (5.1k citations). Henry Chesbrough has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Denmark and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Ellen Enkel, Oliver Gassmann, Marcel Bogers, Melissa M. Appleyard, Jim Spohrer, Wim Vanhaverbeke, Sabine Brunswicker, Joel West, Kevin L. Schwartz and Tobias Weiblen. Their work appears in journals such as California Management Review, Research-Technology Management, R and D Management, Research Policy and Communications of the ACM.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.