A research manifesto for services science
Impact in
- Marketing 483
Classified as
- Authors
- Henry W. ChesbroughJim Spohrer
- Journal
- Communications of the ACM
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1145/1139922.1139945 →Countries where authors are citing A research manifesto for services science
This map shows the geographic impact of A research manifesto for services science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A research manifesto for services science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A research manifesto for services science more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A research manifesto for services science
This network shows the impact of A research manifesto for services science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A research manifesto for services science.
About A research manifesto for services science
This paper, published in 2006, received 801 indexed citations . Written by Henry W. Chesbrough and Jim Spohrer covering the research area of Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Marketing and Strategy and Management. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Marketing (483 citations), Management Information Systems (229 citations), Information Systems (213 citations), Strategy and Management (208 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (205 citations). Published in Communications of the ACM.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1145/1139922.1139945.