Helen R. Wright

15 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Helen R. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 461
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 597
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 324
  • Physiology 107
  • Global and Planetary Change 91
Replace Eliza Van Reen with:
Eliza Van Reen United States
Jakub Späti Switzerland
Corrado Garbazza Switzerland
Shingo Kitamura Japan
Helena Almirall Spain
Luísa K. Pilz Brazil
Angus C. Burns Australia
Minori Enomoto Japan
Ybe Meesters Netherlands
Christine Blume Austria
Helen R. Wright relative to Eliza Van Reen United States Eliza Van Reen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Eliza Van Reen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Helen R. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Helen R. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helen R. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helen R. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Helen R. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helen R. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helen R. Wright. The network helps show where Helen R. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Helen R. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Helen R. Wright Line = papers co-authored together Helen R. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2008200
2 2013188
3 2001171
4 2004139
5 2012108
6 201297
7 200762
8 200750
9 200139
10 200916
11 19593
12 20222
13 19542
14 19931
15 20221
16 19561

About Helen R. Wright

Helen R. Wright is a scholar working on Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Physiology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 16 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Circadian rhythm and melatonin (8 papers), Sleep and related disorders (7 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (6 papers), Spaceflight effects on biology (2 papers), Light effects on plants (2 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (1 paper), Short Stories in Global Literature (1 paper) and Canadian Identity and History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (461 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (597 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (324 citations), Physiology (107 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (91 citations). Helen R. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Leon Lack, Michael Gradisar, Michelle A. Short, David J. Kennaway, Kurt Lushington, Eus J.W. Van Someren, Hayley Dohnt, Julia F. Dewald, Amy R. Wolfson and Mary A. Carskadon. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pineal Research, Journal of Adolescence, Social Service Review, European Journal of Ageing and Behavioral Sleep Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact