Countries where authors publish in Journal of Human Rights Practice
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Human Rights Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Human Rights Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Human Rights Practice more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Journal of Human Rights Practice
This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Human Rights Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Human Rights Practice.
About Journal of Human Rights Practice
The 520 papers published in Journal of Human Rights Practice in the last decades have received a total of 4.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Human Rights Practice usually cover Law (112 papers), Political Science and International Relations (234 papers), Sociology and Political Science (252 papers), Health (29 papers) and History (54 papers) specifically the topics of International Law and Human Rights (137 papers), War, Law, and Justice (64 papers), Human Rights and Development (58 papers), Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (51 papers), Ombudsman and Human Rights (25 papers), Migration, Racism, and Human Rights (25 papers), Legal Rights and Human Rights (24 papers) and Environmental law and policy (20 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Human Rights Practice are Mark Heywood, Tshepo Madlingozi, Philip Alston, Stephen Hopgood, Richard Hugman, Eileen Pittaway, Paul Gready, Sam Gregory, Paul C. Gorski and James Harrison.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.