Mark Heller

2.1k citations
61 papers · 999 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Heller

51 papers receiving 762 citations

Peers

Mark Heller
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • History and Philosophy of Science 282
  • Philosophy 542
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 544
  • Theoretical Computer Science 12
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 170
Replace Edward Craig with:
Edward Craig United Kingdom
John Woods Canada
Peter Pagin Sweden
Peter Lasersohn United States
Dagfinn Føllesdal Norway
Ian Rumfitt United Kingdom
Pascal Engel France
Marie McGinn United Kingdom
Brian Loar United States
Mark Richard United States
Mark Heller relative to Edward Craig United Kingdom Edward Craig's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Edward Craig · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Heller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Heller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Heller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Heller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Heller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Heller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Heller. The network helps show where Mark Heller may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Mark Heller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Heller Line = papers co-authored together Mark Heller links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990193
2 199385
3 199980
4 198472
5 199954
6 199547
7 199645
8 199840
9 199637
10 200026
11 199622
12 200020
13 198919
14 198018
15 198817
16 199217
17 198016
18 199116
19 199316
20 201214

About Mark Heller

Mark Heller is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 61 papers that have together received 999 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (9 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (7 papers), Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts (6 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (6 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (4 papers), Middle East Politics and Society (3 papers), Free Will and Agency (3 papers) and Semantic Web and Ontologies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (282 citations), Philosophy (542 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (544 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (12 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (170 citations). Mark Heller has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include William R. Carter, Noshir Contractor, David R. Seibold, Elia Zureik, William B. Quandt, Jeffrey Greenhut, Dean W. Zimmerman, Shuhong Wang, Steven L. Spiegel and Bernard Berofsky. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Noûs and Foreign Affairs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact