Heather Decot

438 citations
6 papers · 331 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Heather Decot

6 papers receiving 328 citations

Peers

Heather Decot
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 192
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 31
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 161
  • Biological Psychiatry 11
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 23
Replace Costanza Burattini with:
Costanza Burattini Italy
Amanda C. Burton United States
Victor Mathis France
Michelle R. Breier United States
Marion Jalabert France
Niels R. Ntamati Switzerland
Diana Kyriazis United Kingdom
Sybren F. de Kloet Netherlands
Bastiaan van der Veen United Kingdom
Hanfei Deng China
Heather Decot relative to Costanza Burattini Italy Costanza Burattini's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Costanza Burattini · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Heather Decot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Heather Decot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Heather Decot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Heather Decot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Heather Decot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Heather Decot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Heather Decot. The network helps show where Heather Decot may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Heather Decot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Heather Decot Line = papers co-authored together Heather Decot links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1 2013107
2 201491
3 201657
4 201240
5 201423
6 201313

About Heather Decot

Heather Decot is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 331 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (2 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (2 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (1 paper), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (1 paper), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (1 paper) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (192 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (31 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (161 citations), Biological Psychiatry (11 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (23 citations). Heather Decot has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Garret D. Stuber, Dennis R. Sparta, Joshua H. Jennings, Alice M. Stamatakis, Zoé A. McElligott, Pranish A. Kantak, Daniel R. Weinberger, José Apud, Randall L. Ung and Fengyu Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as Neuropsychopharmacology, American Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of Neuroscience, Neuropharmacology and CNS Drugs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact