Harm Derksen

4.5k citations
83 papers · 2.0k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Harm Derksen

81 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Harm Derksen
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Algebra and Number Theory 612
  • Computational Mathematics 77
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 399
  • Geometry and Topology 961
  • Mathematical Physics 329
Replace Igor R. Shafarevich with:
Igor R. Shafarevich Russia
Stefano Serra‐Capizzano Italy
Loring W. Tu United States
Jeffrey S. Geronimo United States
Albrecht Böttcher Germany
Rick Miranda United States
L. Auslander United States
Gerhard Schmeißer Germany
Reinhold Remmert Germany
Andrzej Schinzel Poland
Harm Derksen relative to Igor R. Shafarevich Russia Igor R. Shafarevich's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Igor R. Shafarevich · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Harm Derksen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Harm Derksen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Harm Derksen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Harm Derksen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Harm Derksen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Harm Derksen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Harm Derksen. The network helps show where Harm Derksen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Harm Derksen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Harm Derksen Line = papers co-authored together Harm Derksen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 83 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007323
2 2002235
3 2008189
4 2008164
5 2010138
6 200095
7 201574
8 200235
9 199934
10 201131
11 202030
12 200228
13 201027
14 200725
15 200525
16 200223
17 200023
18 201523
19 201522
20 200822

About Harm Derksen

Harm Derksen is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Algebra and Number Theory, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Mathematical Physics and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, having authored 83 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (21 papers), Advanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems (13 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (13 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (13 papers), Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics (11 papers), Tensor decomposition and applications (10 papers), Commutative Algebra and Its Applications (8 papers) and Polynomial and algebraic computation (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (612 citations), Computational Mathematics (77 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (399 citations), Geometry and Topology (961 citations) and Mathematical Physics (329 citations). Harm Derksen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jerzy Weyman, Gregor Kemper, Yi Ma, Andrei Zelevinsky, John Wright, Wei Hong, Robert M. Fossum, Allen Y. Yang, Kayvan Najarian and Jessica Sidman. Their work appears in journals such as Advances in Mathematics, Journal of Algebra, Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, Journal of the American Mathematical Society and Compositio Mathematica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact