Hannah E. Moore
Impact in
- Insect Science top 2%
- Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies
- Insect Pheromone Research and Control
- Hematology top 10%
- Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Papers in
-
- Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies 11
-
- Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments 3
- Co-authors
- Falko P. Drijfhout (11 shared papers)Faith E. Davies (5 shared papers)Gareth John Morgan (5 shared papers)Emma L. Davenport (5 shared papers)Craig D. Adam (3 shared papers)Paul Workman (3 shared papers)Swee Y. Sharp (3 shared papers)Alan Stewart Dunlop (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Forensic Science International (5 papers)Blood (3 papers)Scientific Reports (3 papers)Molecular Cancer Therapeutics (1 paper)Journal of Forensic Sciences (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Hannah E. Moore
25 papers receiving 801 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Insect Science 282
- Hematology 111
- Cell Biology 65
- Analytical Chemistry 48
- Spectroscopy 53
Countries citing papers authored by Hannah E. Moore
This map shows the geographic impact of Hannah E. Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hannah E. Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hannah E. Moore more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hannah E. Moore
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hannah E. Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hannah E. Moore. The network helps show where Hannah E. Moore may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hannah E. Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 205 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 71 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 69 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 50 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 46 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 46 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 45 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 32 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 32 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 27 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 26 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 26 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 25 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 22 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 18 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 14 | |
| 17 | 2018 | 12 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 11 | |
| 19 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 8 |
About Hannah E. Moore
Hannah E. Moore is a scholar working on Insect Science, Hematology, Neurology, Spectroscopy and Molecular Biology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 807 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies (11 papers), Heat shock proteins research (3 papers), Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments (3 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (2 papers), Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations (2 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (1 paper) and Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (282 citations), Hematology (111 citations), Cell Biology (65 citations), Analytical Chemistry (48 citations) and Spectroscopy (53 citations). Hannah E. Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Falko P. Drijfhout, Faith E. Davies, Gareth John Morgan, Emma L. Davenport, Craig D. Adam, Paul Workman, Swee Y. Sharp, Alan Stewart Dunlop, Robert B. Cody and M. Eric Benbow. Their work appears in journals such as Forensic Science International, Blood, Scientific Reports, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics and Journal of Forensic Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.