Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

6.6k papers and 266.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 6.6k papers published in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics in the last decades have received a total of 266.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics usually cover Molecular Biology (4.1k papers), Oncology (2.9k papers) and Cancer Research (1.2k papers) specifically the topics of Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (629 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (469 papers) and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer (467 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics are Razelle Kurzrock, Sandip Pravin Patel, Edith A. Perez, Daniel D. Von Hoff, Garth Powis, Frank A. Sinicrope, Takumi Kawabe, Yves Pommier, Shengbing Huang and Santosh K. Katiyar.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

Countries where authors publish in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Molecular Cancer Therapeutics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025