Hai‐Lei Ding

1.6k citations
44 papers · 1.2k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Hai‐Lei Ding

42 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Hai‐Lei Ding
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 62
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 281
  • Physiology 366
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 79
  • Biological Psychiatry 24
Replace Kyle M. Baumbauer with:
Kyle M. Baumbauer United States
Sandra M. Garraway United States
Hita Adwanikar United States
Diane Lane United States
Kathia M. Johnson United States
Gareth J. Hathway United Kingdom
H.S. Sharma Sweden
Renée R. Donahue United States
Atsushi Takaki Japan
Megan Ryan Detloff United States
Hai‐Lei Ding relative to Kyle M. Baumbauer United States Kyle M. Baumbauer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Kyle M. Baumbauer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hai‐Lei Ding

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hai‐Lei Ding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hai‐Lei Ding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hai‐Lei Ding more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hai‐Lei Ding

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hai‐Lei Ding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hai‐Lei Ding. The network helps show where Hai‐Lei Ding may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hai‐Lei Ding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hai‐Lei Ding Line = papers co-authored together Hai‐Lei Ding links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016137
2 200892
3 201781
4 201566
5 200558
6 201758
7 201655
8 200355
9 200953
10 202050
11 200549
12 200441
13 202134
14 201632
15 201231
16 202127
17 202126
18 202125
19 202323
20 200522

About Hai‐Lei Ding

Hai‐Lei Ding is a scholar working on Physiology, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (18 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (7 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (6 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (5 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (5 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (4 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (3 papers) and Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (62 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (281 citations), Physiology (366 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (79 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (24 citations). Hai‐Lei Ding has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Jun‐Li Cao, Kristine E. Kamm, James T. Stull, Weizhong Zhu, Zhao-Nian Zhou, Jian‐Wen Dong, Junxia Yang, Hongxing Zhang, Su-Wan Hu and He Liu. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Biological Psychiatry, Anesthesiology, Life Sciences and Current Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact