H. Smith

1.0k citations
22 papers · 794 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

H. Smith

19 papers receiving 683 citations

Peers

H. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Ophthalmology 62
  • Social Psychology 148
  • Sociology and Political Science 269
  • Gender Studies 45
  • Applied Psychology 21
Replace Emanuela Mari with:
Emanuela Mari Italy
David R. Rudy United States
Muriel Egerton United Kingdom
William J. Sullivan United States
Lili Huang China
Xiying Wang China
Michael D. Martinez United States
John Richards United States
Michael S. Steinberg United States
Mary Richardson United States
H. Smith relative to Emanuela Mari Italy Emanuela Mari's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.4×
Emanuela Mari · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Smith. The network helps show where H. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside H. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H. Smith Line = papers co-authored together H. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001351
2 200866
3 195964
4 198059
5 196354
6 200541
7 196235
8 201032
9 196421
10 197019
11 201018
12 196310
13 19666
14 20086
15 19714
16 19594
17
The use of visual function measures for predicting a relocating prism for patients with AMD
20032
18 20251
19 20221
20 20250

About H. Smith

H. Smith is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Epidemiology, Neurology and Genetics, having authored 22 papers that have together received 794 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Steroid Chemistry and Biochemistry (4 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (2 papers), Organic Chemistry Cycloaddition Reactions (2 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (2 papers), Marine Sponges and Natural Products (2 papers), Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research (2 papers), Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry (1 paper) and Phytochemical compounds biological activities (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (62 citations), Social Psychology (148 citations), Sociology and Political Science (269 citations), Gender Studies (45 citations) and Applied Psychology (21 citations). H. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Iain Walker, Alan Tennant, James B. Richardson, W. B. Whalley, Joel S. Mindel, Elijah C. Walker, Arthur J. Birch, Randal W. Richards, Christine Dickinson and Robert A. Harper. Their work appears in journals such as Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, Tetrahedron, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, Otolaryngology and The Laryngoscope.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact