Tess Lea
Impact in
- Health top 2%
- Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
-
- Geographies of human-animal interactions
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Gillian Cowlishaw (2 shared papers)Jennifer R. Wolgemuth (8 shared papers)Janet Helmer (8 shared papers)Chris Gibson (2 shared papers)Susan Luckman (2 shared papers)Emma Kowal (1 shared paper)Jonathan R. Carapetis (4 shared papers)Fay H. Johnston (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Social Science & Medicine (2 papers)Annual Review of Anthropology (2 papers)Radical History Review (2 papers)Visual Anthropology Review (2 papers)Australian Journal of Public Administration (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Tess Lea
68 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
- Health 247
- Geography, Planning and Development 139
- Urban Studies 110
- Anthropology 137
- Education 275
Countries citing papers authored by Tess Lea
This map shows the geographic impact of Tess Lea's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tess Lea with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tess Lea more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tess Lea
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tess Lea. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tess Lea. The network helps show where Tess Lea may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tess Lea, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 95 | |
| 2 | Moving Anthropology: Critical Indigenous Studies | 2006 | 68 |
| 3 | 2009 | 67 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 63 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 50 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 49 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 44 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 38 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 35 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 35 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 33 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 32 | |
| 13 | The School readiness of Australian Indigenous children : a review of the literature | 2008 | 32 |
| 14 | 2013 | 32 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 27 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 24 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 23 | |
| 18 | 2020 | 23 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 22 | |
| 20 | 2013 | 22 |
About Tess Lea
Tess Lea is a scholar working on Health, Education, Sociology and Political Science, Geography, Planning and Development and Anthropology, having authored 70 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (17 papers), Education Systems and Policy (12 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (11 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (8 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (8 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (8 papers), Urban Transport and Accessibility (5 papers) and Indigenous Studies and Ecology (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (247 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (139 citations), Urban Studies (110 citations), Anthropology (137 citations) and Education (275 citations). Tess Lea has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Gillian Cowlishaw, Jennifer R. Wolgemuth, Janet Helmer, Chris Gibson, Susan Luckman, Emma Kowal, Jonathan R. Carapetis, Fay H. Johnston, Stephen T. Garnett and Ian Buchanan. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Annual Review of Anthropology, Radical History Review, Visual Anthropology Review and Australian Journal of Public Administration.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.